midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2010 Ohio 6257
Ohio
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Relator filed a three-count UPL complaint against Foreclosure Alternatives, Inc. (FAI), Kert Alexakis, and Lance Trester alleging unauthorized practice of law in foreclosure actions.
  • FAI solicited homeowners facing foreclosure, had non-attorney personnel manage pleadings, negotiate with lenders, and coordinate with licensed attorneys.
  • Non-attorneys provided legal advice, counselling, and settlement negotiation in foreclosure contexts without Ohio bar licensure.
  • Alexander and Trester were officers/employees; Trester used name “Baker” to conceal ties to father’s felony conviction.
  • Two specific foreclosures (Chandlers and a second homeowner) resulted in sheriff’s sales after FAI’s involvement; homeowners suffered loss of homes.
  • Board found unauthorized practice of law and recommended injunctions and civil penalties; the Supreme Court adopted and imposed the sanctions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether FAI and agents engaged in unauthorized practice of law FAI and Trester provided legal services. FAI contends activities were non-attorney services. Yes; UPL found; injunction issued.
Whether an injunction against further UPL is warranted Prevents ongoing unauthorized practice. Untethered from continuing conduct. Warranted; injunction entered.
Whether civil penalties are justified and amount Penalties appropriate to deter misconduct. Penalties excessive or misapplied. Penalties imposed: $15,000 against FAI/Alexakis, $5,000 against Trester.
Whether joint and several liability applies to penalties Relator seeks joint/several liability. Each liable party bears its own liability. Imposed jointly and severally against FAI and Alexakis; Trester separately.

Key Cases Cited

  • Kolodner, 103 Ohio St.3d 504 (2004-Ohio-5581) (UPL includes nonattorneys advising or negotiating for debtors)
  • Telford, 85 Ohio St.3d 111 (1999-Ohio-) (UPL includes nonlawyers giving legal advice to debtors)
  • Mullaney, 119 Ohio St.3d 412 (2008-Ohio-4541) (laypersons engage in UPL by advising about legal rights and settlement terms)
  • Foreclosure Solutions, 123 Ohio St.3d 107 (2009-Ohio-4174) (civil penalties for large-scale foreclosure-assistance arrangements)
  • Willard, 123 Ohio St.3d 15 (2009-Ohio-3629) (UPL context with attorney involvement as limited by conduct)
  • Patterson, 124 Ohio St.3d 93 (2009-Ohio-6166) (UPL implications of nonlawyer handling foreclosure settlements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Foreclosure Alternatives, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 23, 2010
Citations: 2010 Ohio 6257; 127 Ohio St. 3d 455; 2010-1495
Docket Number: 2010-1495
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In