History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 Ohio 1509
Ohio
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Respondent Anthony J. DeGidio Jr. commingled client funds in his client trust account, used the account to pay personal and business expenses, and failed to cooperate with disciplinary investigation.
  • Relator served complaint by certified mail; DeGidio did not answer; default was entered; master commissioner found misconduct by clear and convincing evidence.
  • Bank records show deposits of personal funds into the trust account and multiple trust checks payable to Cash; overdraft occurred after a large personal/fees disbursement.
  • Board found violations of Prof.Cond.R. 1.15(a), 8.1(b), 8.4(d), 8.4(h) and Gov.Bar R V(4)(G) for cooperation failure.
  • Board recommended two-year suspension with the second year stayed, conditioned on CLE on trust-account management; court adopted this sanction.
  • Aggravating factor: lack of cooperation; mitigating factor: absence of prior disciplinary action.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether DeGidio violated trust-account rules DeGidio commingled funds and overdrew trust account DeGidio disputes improper handling of funds (if raised) Yes; violations found (Rule 1.15(a), etc.).
Whether failure to cooperate justified sanctions Lack of cooperation warranted discipline No additional sanctions requested beyond investigation Yes; lack of cooperation established aggravating factor.
Appropriate sanction for misconduct Two-year suspension with conditional stay aligns with precedent Discipline should be lesser given mitigating factors Two-year suspension with second year stayed, conditioned on CLE.
Whether stay should be conditioned on CLE in trust-account management Condition improves future compliance CLE not necessary Conditioned stay on completion of six hours additional CLE in trust-account management.

Key Cases Cited

  • Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424 (2002-Ohio-4743) (sanctions for comparable misconduct guidance)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Morgan, 114 Ohio St.3d 179 (2007-Ohio-3604) (two-year suspension with conditional stay for similar misconduct)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 115 Ohio St.3d 473 (2007-Ohio-5251) (consideration of aggravating/mitigating factors in sanction)
  • Morgan, Disciplinary Counsel v., 114 Ohio St.3d 179 (2007-Ohio-3604) (precedent for sanction approach)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Morgan, 114 Ohio St.3d 179 (2007-Ohio-3604) (overdrawn trust account and cooperation issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. DeGidio
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 18, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 1509; 135 Ohio St. 3d 407; 987 N.E.2d 681; 2012-1697
Docket Number: 2012-1697
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    Disciplinary Counsel v. DeGidio, 2013 Ohio 1509