History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 Ohio 4554
Ohio
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Respondent Doreen Cantrell, admitted Ohio attorney since 1988, pleaded guilty to two counts of felony grand theft and one count of possession of cocaine in 2009.
  • Following convictions, the court imposed interim felony suspension pending disciplinary proceedings.
  • Disciplinary Counsel filed a two-count complaint alleging violations of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(b) and (h) based on the criminal conduct.
  • Parties stipulated that Cantrell violated 8.4(b) and (h), with mitigating factors (full disclosure, cooperative attitude, other penalties) and aggravating factors (dishonest motive, multiple offenses, prior discipline).
  • Board recommended permanent disbarment; Cantrell argued for indefinite suspension, aided by evidence of restitution efforts and treatment for chemical dependency and mental illness.
  • Court agreed misconduct occurred but modified sanction to indefinite suspension served consecutively to Cantrell’s prior May 20, 2010 indefinite suspension; costs taxed to Cantrell.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
What is the appropriate sanction for Cantrell’s misconduct? Cantrell seeks indefinite suspension; relator urges permanent disbarment. Cantrell argues for lesser sanction due to restitution efforts and treatment; Board urged disbarment. Indefinite suspension, not permanent disbarment.
Should the interim felony suspension be treated as a prior disciplinary offense? Interim suspension should be counted as a prior offense for aggravation. Interim suspensions are not prior disciplinary offenses and should not aggravate sanction. Interim felony suspension is not a prior disciplinary offense; nonetheless, aggravation present for other factors justifies indefinite suspension.

Key Cases Cited

  • Linnen, 111 Ohio St.3d 507 (2006-Ohio-5480) (sanction factors include duties violated, injury, mental state, and comparable sanctions)
  • O'Neill, 103 Ohio St.3d 204 (2004-Ohio-4704) (primary purpose of sanctions is public protection)
  • Sterner, 77 Ohio St.3d 164 (1996-Ohio-633) (evidence timing rules; limited late-stage mitigation)
  • Ulinski, 106 Ohio St.3d 53 (2005-Ohio-3673) (interim suspensions acknowledged but not prior offenses)
  • O'Malley, 126 Ohio St.3d 443 (2010-Ohio-3802) (interim suspensions not prior offenses)
  • Gittinger, 125 Ohio St.3d 467 (2010-Ohio-1830) (prior interim suspensions not counted as prior offenses)
  • Andrews, 124 Ohio St.3d 523 (2010-Ohio-931) (prior disciplinary factors considered in sanction)
  • LoDico, 118 Ohio St.3d 316 (2008-Ohio-2465) (felony and misdemeanor convictions may warrant indefinite suspension)
  • Saunders, 127 Ohio St.3d 241 (2010-Ohio-5708) (indefinite suspension for additional infractions when prior felony conviction exists)
  • Butler, 128 Ohio St.3d 319 (2011-Ohio-236) (treats interim suspensions in aggravation analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Cantrell
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 14, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 4554; 130 Ohio St. 3d 46; 2011-0281
Docket Number: 2011-0281
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In