History
  • No items yet
midpage
2016 Ohio 3045
Ohio
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Daniel L. Bennett, admitted in 2000, faced disciplinary charges for neglect, trust-account misuse, and failure to cooperate with disciplinary inquiries; matter proceeded on stipulated facts and hearing testimony.
  • Bennett met with a prospective client, Brittany Wilson, then later represented her husband Joe Wilson without informing either or obtaining written waivers; he later withdrew and agreed to refund $327.50 but could not confirm delivery.
  • Bennett was retained by Wayne Williams to file a divorce but failed to file the complaint or return an alleged $250 refund that Williams says he never received.
  • Bennett stopped communicating with clients Billy and Senora Parson in a foreclosure matter, failed to inform them of a sheriff’s sale, and ignored multiple inquiry letters from disciplinary counsel.
  • Between March 30 and April 6, 2015, Bennett missed 16 court-appointed hearings for indigent defendants and failed to appear at a show-cause hearing; he later attributed absences to family problems.
  • Relator discovered a $43.28 overdraft in Bennett’s client trust account; Bennett admitted making personal purchases from the trust account, failing to maintain ledgers, and not performing monthly reconciliations; he also failed to respond to multiple disciplinary inquiry letters.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Conflict of interest / communication with represented person Bennett met with prospective client Brittany and later represented her husband without disclosure or written waivers, violating Prof.Cond.R. 1.18(c) and 4.2 Bennett did not obtain or confirm waivers and continued communications; no defense to conflict shown Violation of Prof.Cond.R. 1.18(c) and 4.2 found
Neglect / failure to act for retained clients Bennett failed to timely file a divorce for Williams and did not return retainer funds, violating Prof.Cond.R. 1.3 Bennett claimed he sent refund checks but cannot confirm receipt Violation of Prof.Cond.R. 1.3 found
Trust-account and recordkeeping violations; failure to cooperate with investigation Bennett overdrew trust account, made personal purchases, lacked ledgers and reconciliations, and ignored inquiry letters, violating Prof.Cond.R. 1.15 duties and 8.1(b)/Gov.Bar R. V(9)(G) Bennett admitted recordkeeping and trust-account failures but failed to respond to disciplinary requests Violations of Prof.Cond.R. 1.15(a), 1.15(a)(2),(3),(5), 8.1(b), and Gov.Bar R. V(9)(G) found
Failure to communicate and to appear for court-appointed matters; prejudicial conduct Bennett ceased communicating with Parsons and missed multiple appointed hearings, violating Prof.Cond.R. 1.4, 1.3, 1.16(c), and 8.4(d) Bennett cited personal/family problems but did not notify clients or courts appropriately Violations of Prof.Cond.R. 1.4(a)(3),(4), 1.3, 1.16(c), and 8.4(d) found

Key Cases Cited

  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Brueggeman, 128 Ohio St.3d 206 (imposed conditionally stayed one-year suspension for neglect, failure to refund, and failure to respond to relator; no prior discipline)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Oberholtzer, 136 Ohio St.3d 314 (imposed conditionally stayed one-year suspension for neglected matters, failure to deposit retainer, and failure to respond to relator; no prior discipline)
  • Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424 (discusses factors courts consider when imposing sanctions for attorney misconduct)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 19, 2016
Citations: 2016 Ohio 3045; 146 Ohio St. 3d 237; 54 N.E.3d 1232; 2015-2004
Docket Number: 2015-2004
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In