History
  • No items yet
midpage
261 P.3d 739
Wyo.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Dickey was stopped for crossing the center line three times; deputies Proffitt and Budd conducted the stop.
  • Dispatcher checked Dickey and passenger; both had prior contacts with law enforcement; no warrants found.
  • Deputy Proffitt called Officer Brothers with drug dog Eddy to the scene during the stop.
  • A canine sniff occurred about 13.5 minutes into the stop; dog alerted to controlled substances.
  • A search of the interior yielded a purse with methamphetamine; passenger stated Dickey handed her the purse.
  • Dickey challenged the stop as unconstitutionally extended to allow the dog sniff; district court denied suppression.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was evidence suppressed for unlawful detention during the stop? Dickey State No suppression; detention reasonable and dog sniff lawful

Key Cases Cited

  • Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (U.S. 2005) (exterior sniff during lawful stop permissible)
  • Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1979) (standard for initial traffic stop)
  • Garvin v. State, 172 P.3d 725 (Wyo. 2007) (two-part stop analysis; reasonableness of actions during detention)
  • Wallace v. State, 221 P.3d 967 (Wyo. 2009) (Fourth Amendment detention framework in Wyoming)
  • Damato v. State, 64 P.3d 700 (Wyo. 2003) (routine stop; scope of detention and investigation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dickey v. State
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 28, 2011
Citations: 261 P.3d 739; 2011 Wyo. LEXIS 142; 2011 WL 4469897; 2011 WY 136; S-11-0062
Docket Number: S-11-0062
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
Log In
    Dickey v. State, 261 P.3d 739