History
  • No items yet
midpage
Devon Kane Ryerson v. State of Florida
189 So. 3d 1047
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant charged with two non-forcible third-degree felonies and entered a no-contest plea with no negotiated sentence.
  • Sentencing scoresheet totaled 5.1 points, which falls below the 22-point threshold in section 775.082(10), creating a presumptive nonstate-prison sanction.
  • Trial court imposed a prison sentence of 30 months followed by two years' probation (concurrent).
  • Appellant moved to correct sentence, arguing the court failed to make the written findings required by section 775.082(10) to justify a state prison sentence.
  • Trial court issued an order stating the defendant was a "clear and present danger to the community," but did not expressly find that a nonstate prison sanction would present a danger to the public or explain the required nexus.
  • Fourth District reversed and remanded for resentencing, directing imposition of a nonstate prison sanction because the required written findings were not made.

Issues

Issue Appellant's Argument State's Argument Held
Whether the trial court complied with §775.082(10) before imposing a state prison sentence when total sentence points ≤22 Trial court failed to make the written findings that a nonstate prison sanction could present a danger to the public Trial court argued the order finding the defendant a "clear and present danger" satisfied the statute Reversed: statutory requirement unmet because findings did not establish nexus that a nonstate sanction would endanger the public

Key Cases Cited

  • Jones v. State, 71 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding nonstate prison sanction is presumptive when points ≤22 unless court makes written findings of danger)
  • Porter v. State, 110 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (upholding sufficiency of written findings that tied continued danger to release under nonstate sanction)
  • Bradley v. State, 155 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (recognizing statutory requirement that court find such a sentence poses danger to public)
  • Dresch v. State, 150 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (directing that failure to make required findings mandates resentencing to nonstate sanction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Devon Kane Ryerson v. State of Florida
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 20, 2016
Citation: 189 So. 3d 1047
Docket Number: 4D15-1902
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.