History
  • No items yet
midpage
Deshawn Gervin v. Pamela Florence
139 F.4th 1236
11th Cir.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • DeShawn Gervin was convicted in Georgia for attempted burglary and sentenced to probation with just one condition: he could not return to a specified judicial circuit in Georgia.
  • Gervin complied, moving to North Carolina, where he was later incarcerated for unrelated offenses.
  • Georgia probation officers sought his arrest, claiming Gervin violated his Georgia probation by failing to report, despite no such condition existing.
  • Gervin was extradited to Georgia and spent 104 days in jail before the state court determined no probation violation had occurred and released him.
  • Gervin filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment violations by the officers for wrongful arrest and detention.
  • Defendants moved for summary judgment, claiming no constitutional violation and asserting qualified immunity; the district court denied their motion on the Fourth Amendment claim.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Can a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim be based on a probation revocation proceeding rather than a criminal prosecution? Gervin: Any unreasonable seizure pursuant to legal process—including probation revocation—supports a § 1983 malicious prosecution claim. Florence/Milton: Malicious prosecution claims require initiation of a criminal prosecution, not merely a probation revocation. The Fourth Amendment's protection applies to all unreasonable seizures, irrespective of the form of legal process; probation revocation can support a malicious prosecution claim.
Did the probation officers recklessly or intentionally provide false information to secure Gervin’s arrest and detention? The officers made material false statements and omissions about Gervin’s probation conditions, leading to an unjustified arrest and confinement. The officers acted within their duties; no intentional or reckless falsehoods, and they are entitled to qualified immunity. Evidence, viewed favorably to Gervin, supports a reckless disregard standard; no qualified immunity for knowingly or recklessly misrepresenting facts to justify a seizure.
Are probation officers entitled to qualified immunity for actions taken in the probation revocation process? Not when conduct violates clearly established law; recklessly causing an unconstitutional seizure removes qualified immunity. Officers claim the law was not clearly established for probation violations to support Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution and that their actions were reasonable. Qualified immunity denied; clearly established law prohibits using false statements or omissions in legal process resulting in unconstitutional detentions.
Does favorable termination of the probation revocation proceeding satisfy the requirements for a malicious prosecution claim? Gervin: Favorable termination occurred when his probation was not revoked and he was released. Defendants: Not termination of a criminal prosecution, so not sufficient. Yes; a favorable resolution of the probation revocation in Gervin’s favor satisfies the requirement.

Key Cases Cited

  • Thompson v. Clark, 596 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court outlined elements of malicious prosecution claim under § 1983)
  • Manuel v. City of Joliet, 580 U.S. 357 (Fourth Amendment governs claims of unconstitutional pretrial detention regardless of process type)
  • Kalina v. Fletcher, 522 U.S. 118 (Section 1983 construed in light of common-law principles as of 1871)
  • Owens v. Kelley, 681 F.2d 1362 (11th Cir. 1982) (Fourth Amendment protections extend to probationers)
  • Williams v. Aguirre, 965 F.3d 1147 (11th Cir. 2020) (Malicious prosecution a shorthand for certain Fourth Amendment claims: seizure pursuant to legal process)
  • Paez v. Mulvey, 915 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2019) (Material misstatements/omissions in warrant application can violate Fourth Amendment)
  • Lee v. Ferraro, 284 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2002) (Summary judgment and qualified immunity standards in § 1983 suits)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Deshawn Gervin v. Pamela Florence
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Jun 9, 2025
Citation: 139 F.4th 1236
Docket Number: 23-11452
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.