midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
460 P.3d 1044
Or. Ct. App.
2020
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2017 the juvenile court changed the permanency plan for Z from reunification to adoption.
  • Mother’s parental rights were terminated in April 2018; adoption finalization was delayed by appeals and related proceedings.
  • ORS 419B.470(8) required periodic permanency hearings; at a June 2019 permanency hearing DHS moved to have mother submit to a psychological evaluation to guide case planning and post‑termination contact.
  • Mother objected and requested a separate evidentiary hearing; the juvenile court overruled and ordered the evaluation while keeping the plan of adoption.
  • Mother appealed, arguing the court lacked authority to order the evaluation without first establishing the need at an evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.387.
  • The appellate court held the court erred in ordering the psychological evaluation after the plan had become adoption and mother’s parental rights had been terminated; it reversed and instructed deletion of that requirement and otherwise affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Denial of mother’s request for a separate evidentiary hearing on DHS’s motion Mother: she was entitled to a hearing to establish need before being ordered to submit to evaluation DHS: the permanency hearing sufficed and DHS needed the evaluation for case planning/post‑termination contact Court found mother’s objection preserved; but because evaluation could not be authorized post‑TPR, no remand for evidentiary hearing was necessary
Authority to order mother to submit to psychological evaluation after plan changed to adoption and TPR Mother: ORS 419B.387 only authorizes orders for treatment/training (and related evaluations) to remedy conditions for reunification after an evidentiary showing of need DHS: evaluation was appropriate to inform case planning and facilitate post‑termination contact Court held ORS 419B.387 does not authorize ordering evaluations post‑TPR/adoption plan; the order was erroneous and was deleted

Key Cases Cited

  • Dept. of Human Services v. A. F., 295 Or App 69 (2018) (standard of review for juvenile court legal conclusions and findings)
  • Dept. of Human Services v. D. R. D., 298 Or App 788 (2019) (ORS 419B.387 permits psychological evaluation only after evidentiary hearing establishing need for remedial treatment/training)
  • Dept. of Human Services v. T. L. H., 300 Or App 606 (2019) (affirming similar use of ORS 419B.387 following an evidentiary showing)
  • State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. G. L., 220 Or App 216 (2008) (discussing court authority under ORS 419B.337(2) to order parents participate in services the court directs DHS to provide)
  • State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Macginnis, 28 Or App 935 (1977) (earlier interpretation of court authority to require parental participation in ordered services)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dept. of Human Services v. P. W.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Feb 20, 2020
Citations: 460 P.3d 1044; 302 Or. App. 355; A171514
Docket Number: A171514
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In