History
  • No items yet
midpage
Department of Central Management Services/The Department of Public Health v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel
979 N.E.2d 603
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • CMS, DPH, DNR, and EPA petitioned to exclude option 8Es from the bargaining unit but include them as public employees under the Act.
  • Board initially adopted ALJ findings that option 8Es were non-supervisors and eligible for inclusion in a professional unit.
  • Option 8Es are engineers (8E) under CMS class specs; duties include investigations, enforcement, reporting, and field oversight.
  • Testimony from DeWitt (DPH), Schuck (DNR), and Yurdin (EPA) described supervisory acts over subordinates (training, reviewing work, overtime decisions, discipline, evaluations).
  • ALJ found no indicia of supervisory status; Board reaffirmed the ALJ’s findings in 2010, leading to certification of Council 31.
  • Court reversed, holding option 8Es perform supervisory functions and devote a preponderance of time to those tasks.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether option 8Es are supervisors under 3(r). CMS argues option 8Es perform supervisory functions with independent judgment. Board/ALJ contended time spent on supervisory tasks is not predominant; not supervisors. Yes; option 8Es are supervisors under 3(r).

Key Cases Cited

  • Village of Maryville v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel, 402 Ill. App. 3d 369 (2010) (preponderance time not solely determinative; supervisory authority essential)
  • City of Freeport v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 135 Ill. 2d 499 (1990) (preponderance time test; independent judgment and supervisory duties)
  • City of Peru v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 167 Ill. App. 3d 284 (1988) (supervisory elements include independent judgment and time spent on supervisory tasks)
  • Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, State Panel, 278 Ill. App. 3d 79 (1996) (definition and scope of supervisory status; functions vs. time allocation)
  • Chief Judge of the Circuit Court v. AFSCME, Council 31, 153 Ill. 2d 508 (1992) (preponderance of time to supervisory duties; conceptual standard for supervision)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Department of Central Management Services/The Department of Public Health v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Nov 16, 2012
Citation: 979 N.E.2d 603
Docket Number: 4-11-0013
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.