History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dennis James Draper, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
64A03-1612-CR-2943
| Ind. Ct. App. | Apr 24, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Draper was charged in Porter County (Oct 6, 2009) with Class B burglary; posted bond twice but had bench warrants issued (June 28, 2010; later in 2015).
  • While on bond in Porter County, Draper was arrested and convicted in Lake County (May 22, 2010) and received a seven-year sentence.
  • Draper remained incarcerated on the Lake County matter from May 22, 2010 until release to parole on July 9, 2013.
  • He was arrested on the Porter County June 28, 2010 bench warrant on July 18, 2013, held until release on prior bonds July 29, 2013.
  • Arrested again July 30, 2015 on a Porter County warrant, held until he pled guilty January 4, 2016; sentenced in Porter County to four years with the trial court awarding 219 days’ pre-sentence credit.
  • Draper sought additional pre-trial credit; the State conceded some entitlement but disputed the full amount.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Draper is entitled to credit from issuance of June 28, 2010 Porter warrant through July 9, 2013 State: Not entitled because he was not arrested on the Porter warrant and the time was served on Lake County sentence which was run consecutively Draper: Warrant issuance (and alleged detainer) made him confined for credit purposes from June 28, 2010 Denied: confinement for credit begins at actual arrest, and those days were credited to the Lake County sentence; consecutive-sentence rule prevents double-counting
Whether Draper is entitled to credit for July 18–28, 2013 (arrest on Porter warrant to release on prior bonds) State: Concedes these days should be credited Draper: Requested credit for this period Granted on remand: trial court must award credit for July 18–28, 2013
Whether Draper is entitled to credit for July 31, 2015–Jan 4, 2016 (arrest to guilty plea/release) State: Concedes credit is owed for this period Draper: Requested credit for this period Granted on remand: trial court must award credit for July 31, 2015–Jan 4, 2016
Effect of consecutive sentencing on allocation of pre-sentence credit State: Time served on Lake County sentence appropriately applied to aggregate due to statutory consecutive requirement Draper: Argued some overlapping credit should apply to Porter sentence (via alleged detainer) Held: When sentences are consecutive, credit is applied to the aggregate; awarding credit twice would effectively make sentences concurrent and is impermissible

Key Cases Cited

  • Hall v. State, 944 N.E.2d 538 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (pre-sentence credit is statutory right; credit depends on confinement and relation to the sentence imposed)
  • Willoughby v. State, 626 N.E.2d 601 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993) (credit begins at actual arrest on warrant, not issuance of warrant)
  • Dolan v. State, 420 N.E.2d 1364 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981) (time credited from date of arrest on violation/warrant)
  • Lotaki v. State, 4 N.E.3d 656 (Ind. 2014) (when sentences are consecutive, jail credit applies against the aggregate; cannot be credited to multiple sentences causing de facto concurrency)
  • Shane v. State, 716 N.E.2d 391 (Ind. 1999) (jail credit applied against aggregate when sentences are consecutive)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dennis James Draper, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 24, 2017
Docket Number: 64A03-1612-CR-2943
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.