History
  • No items yet
midpage
22 A.3d 382
R.I.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Kathleen DeLuca, city treasurer and acting director of finance for Cranston, was suspended on October 20, 1997 following Grand Jury indictments.
  • On May 1, 1998, Mayor Traficante sent a letter stating the city would place DeLuca’s salary in the surplus during suspension and would reinstate her with back pay and benefits if acquitted or case dismissed.
  • Effective November 8, 1999, DeLuca's employment was terminated for a ‘Change in Administration.’
  • DeLuca pled nolo contendere on November 20, 2001 to two counts related to filing a false document, and she filed suit in Superior Court on January 8, 2003, alleging breach of contract and civil-service/charter rule violations.
  • Defendants moved for summary judgment in October 2008, arguing (i) no contract existed due to lack of consideration and (ii) DeLuca failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
  • The Superior Court granted summary judgment on March 6, 2009; the Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed, holding no enforceable contract due to lack of consideration and no futility in exhausting remedies.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the May 1, 1998 letter constitutes a binding contract DeLuca contends the letter formed a contract with mutual obligations. City argues no contract due to lack of consideration and essential elements. No enforceable contract; lack of consideration as a matter of law.
Whether exhaustion of administrative remedies was excused by futility Exhaustion would have been futile; she did not pursue remedies due to anticipated futility. Exhaustion required; plaintiff offered no admissible evidence of futility. Futility not established; exhaustion requirement applied.

Key Cases Cited

  • DeAngelis v. DeAngelis, 923 A.2d 1274 (R.I. 2007) (elements of a valid contract; consideration and mutuality)
  • Rhode Island Five v. Medical Associates of Bristol County, Inc., 668 A.2d 1250 (R.I. 1996) (contract formation elements)
  • Downey v. Carcieri, 996 A.2d 1144 (R.I. 2010) (exhaustion of administrative remedies generally required)
  • Richardson v. Rhode Island Department of Education, 947 A.2d 253 (R.I. 2008) (exception to exhaustion when futility shown)
  • Papudesu v. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of Rhode Island, 18 A.3d 495 (R.I. 2011) (de novo review standard for summary judgment)
  • Estate of Giuliano v. Giuliano, 949 A.2d 386 (R.I. 2008) (contract and factual review considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: DeLUCA v. City of Cranston
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Jun 29, 2011
Citations: 22 A.3d 382; 2011 R.I. LEXIS 102; 2011 WL 2565687; 2009-317-APPEAL
Docket Number: 2009-317-APPEAL
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
Log In
    DeLUCA v. City of Cranston, 22 A.3d 382