midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
227 Cal. App. 4th 665
Cal. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Wellesley owned the Los Angeles Property and held a first deed of trust; a junior mechanic’s lien by Decon existed.
  • Wellesley defaulted on the loan secured by the trust deed, and the trustee pursued foreclosure.
  • Wellesley conveyed title to PMCF by deed in lieu of foreclosure, with a provision that the loan documents would not merge and would remain liens.
  • PMCF foreclosed and purchased the Property at the foreclosure sale, later selling to a third party (12304 Santa Monica).
  • Decon’s mechanic’s lien remained outstanding and was asserted against the Property; Decon challenged the foreclosure as having eliminated the lien.
  • Trial court ruled that Decon’s lien was not extinguished; the court entered judgment in Decon’s favor; appellants appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether deed in lieu merges senior lien when junior liens exist Decon argues merger eliminates senior lien PMCF argues no merger occurs with junior liens No merger; foreclosure valid and eliminates junior lien(s)
Whether PMCF’s deed in lieu and foreclose eliminated Decon’s lien Decon asserts lien survived foreclosure PMCF contends lien is extinguished by foreclosure after no-merger Foreclosure eliminated Decon’s lien; PMCF acquired title free of the lien
Effect of no-merger rule on junior lienholders N/A (not favorable to junior liens) N/A No prejudice to junior lienholders; they may bid at foreclosure and recover if value exceeds debt

Key Cases Cited

  • Davis v. Randall, 117 Cal. 12 (Cal. 1897) (merger depends on intent; intervening liens prevent automatic merger)
  • Hines v. Ward, 121 Cal. 115 (Cal. 1898) (no merger when it is in grantee’s interest to preserve mortgage title)
  • Sheldon v. La Brea Materials Co., 216 Cal. 686 (Cal. 1932) (applies merger rule to deeds of trust; no merger when necessary to protect grantee’s rights)
  • Anglo-Californian Bank v. Field, 146 Cal. 644 (Cal. 1905) (general merger rule; exceptions preserve lien interests with interceding liens)
  • Miscione v. Barton Development Co., 52 Cal.App.4th 1320 (Cal.App. 1997) (foreclosure effect on junior liens; lien elimination upon senior foreclosure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Decon Group, Inc. v. Prudential Mortgage Capital Co.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 30, 2014
Citations: 227 Cal. App. 4th 665; 174 Cal. Rptr. 3d 205; 2014 WL 2927406; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 580; B248491
Docket Number: B248491
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    Decon Group, Inc. v. Prudential Mortgage Capital Co., 227 Cal. App. 4th 665