History
  • No items yet
midpage
130 Conn. App. 363
Conn. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Dean-Moss Family Limited Partnership sought to expand a marina by adding ten docking slips and ten parking spaces under a coastal site plan approved by Norwalk zoning.
  • The parking easement at issue, granted in 1980, allowed ten parking spaces on adjacent 117 Rowayton Avenue for use by 119 Rowayton Avenue.
  • Defendant Five Mile River Works, Inc. owns 117 Rowayton Avenue and opposed the plaintiff’s site plan applications.
  • The zoning commission denied the site plans; on appeal, this court remanded to sustain the plaintiff’s appeal, leading to judgment in plaintiff’s favor on January 10, 2007.
  • In 2007 plaintiff began preparing to implement the approvals, but defendant refused access to 117 Rowayton Avenue, prompting this injunctive action filed May 31, 2007.
  • Defendant argued the approvals expired under Norwalk regs § 118-1110(C)(5) because no building permit was issued within one year or an extension granted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the case is moot due to expired approvals Fromer tolling applies; litigation tolls time limits until resolution. Approvals expired under § 118-1110(C)(5) when time elapsed. Yes; tolling applies and case not moot
Whether Fromer tolling extends to this injunctive action Fromer tolling applicable because litigation caused time lapse. Fromer distinguishes administrative appeals from injunction action. Fromer rationale applicable; tolling allowed
Whether the approvals were valid and enforceable during litigation Easement and approvals were valid; defendant obstructed enforcement. Approvals could lapse due to time limits. Approvals valid and enforceable; tolling preserved rights

Key Cases Cited

  • Fromer v. Two Hundred Post Associates, 32 Conn. App. 799 (Conn. App. 1993) (tolls permit duration until all appeals are decided)
  • Dean v. Zoning Commission, 96 Conn. App. 561 (Conn. App. 2006) (remand for favorable ruling on site plan appeals)
  • Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. New London, 265 Conn. 423 (Conn. 2003) (subject matter jurisdiction and mootness framework)
  • Reveron v. Board of Firearms Permit Examiners, 123 Conn. App. 475 (Conn. App. 2010) (justiciability requirements for mootness)
  • Dean v. Zoning Commission, 96 Conn. App. 570 (Conn. App. 2006) (remand context and ongoing litigation relevance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dean-Moss Family Ltd. Partnership v. Five Mile River Works, Inc.
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Jul 26, 2011
Citations: 130 Conn. App. 363; 23 A.3d 745; AC 31615
Docket Number: AC 31615
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    Dean-Moss Family Ltd. Partnership v. Five Mile River Works, Inc., 130 Conn. App. 363