midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
100 F.4th 657
5th Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • DC Operating, LLC, which operates a strip club in El Paso, Texas, and two of its employees challenged the constitutionality of Texas S.B. 315.
  • S.B. 315 raises the minimum employment age for workers in sexually-oriented businesses from 18 to 21 to curb human trafficking.
  • The plaintiffs sued state and local officials, arguing the law unconstitutionally restricted the rights of employees aged 18-20.
  • The district court upheld the statute, and plaintiffs appealed the decision to the Fifth Circuit.
  • By the time of the appeal, both employee-plaintiffs had turned 21, raising mootness concerns.
  • The Fifth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding both lack of standing for the business plaintiff and mootness for the employee plaintiffs.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standing of Business Law infringes rights of employees, harming the business Business not asserting its own rights Business lacks standing
Expressive/Liberty Rights Employees have expressive interest in nude dancing and occupational freedom Law validly regulates minimum employment age Only employees' rights are implicated
Overbreadth Claim Can challenge on behalf of affected employees Article III injury required even for overbreadth Overbreadth claim barred by lack of Article III
Mootness (Employees) Claims still viable due to other potential affected parties Plaintiffs are now 21, so claims moot Employee claims are moot, as they are now over 21

Key Cases Cited

  • Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (plaintiff must assert own legal rights for standing)
  • Sec’y of State of Md. v. Munson Co., 467 U.S. 947 (overbreadth doctrine and standing requirements)
  • Va. v. Am. Booksellers Ass’n, Inc., 484 U.S. 383 (third-party standing and mootness in First Amendment cases)
  • Church of Scientology of Cal. v. United States, 506 U.S. 9 (cases become moot when no effectual relief can be granted)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: DC Operating v. Paxton
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 7, 2024
Citations: 100 F.4th 657; 22-50612
Docket Number: 22-50612
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    DC Operating v. Paxton, 100 F.4th 657