midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
104 So. 3d 467
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Andrew Davisson and Lori Davisson, married seven years, had three related lawsuits in Bossier Parish arising from the breakup.
  • SUIT ONE: divorce with custody/visitation over their only child, J.D., adjudicated in 2002.
  • O’Brien, a court-appointed licensed clinical social worker, evaluated the family beginning in 2007 for custody issues (SUIT ONE).
  • SUIT TWO: Lori obtained a protective order against Andrew in December 2009; order entered January 2010.
  • SUIT THREE: Andrew’s defamation suit against O’Brien, filed January 2011, alleging false statements in 2010; court granted O’Brien summary judgment and denied discovery motion.
  • Appellate court affirmed, awarding $2,500 in attorney fees and all costs against Andrew and his attorney.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether O’Brien’s immunity shields civil liability for defamation Davisson argues factual disputes exist on good faith and truth. O’Brien relies on statutory immunity and truthfulness of statements. Summary judgment upheld; immunity applies.
Whether discovery was properly restricted in the deposition Davisson claims denial of adequate discovery via deposition termination. O’Brien allowed deposition on 2010 events; 2007 questions limited. Discovery properly denied; deposition appropriately terminated.
Whether written reasons for judgment were required Davisson asserts Article 1917(A) requires written reasons. Trial court adequately explained its ruling in open court. No written reasons required; oral reasoning suffices.
Whether sanctions for frivolous appeal were proper Davisson contends appeal not frivolous; seeks relief. Appellate conduct deemed frivolous; sanctions warranted. Appellate sanctions affirmed; $2,500 attorney fees and costs awarded.

Key Cases Cited

  • Kennedy v. Sheriff of East Baton Rouge, 935 So.2d 669 (La. 2006) (immunity and truthfulness issues in defamation arising from reporting abuse)
  • Adams v. Harrah’s Bossier City Inv. Co., 948 So.2d 317 (La.App.2d Cir. 2007) (reliability and reporting obligations of professionals in abuse cases)
  • Nesbitt v. Nesbitt, 79 So.3d 347 (La.App.2d Cir. 2011) (frivolous appeal standards and attorney fee sanctions)
  • Straughter v. Hodnett, 975 So.2d 81 (La.App.2d Cir. 2008) (frivolous appeal damages and discretionary sanctions)
  • Gandy v. United Services Auto Ass'n., 721 So.2d 34 (La.App.5th Cir. 1998) (appellate remedies for frivolous appeals)
  • Smith v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 4 So.3d 983 (La.App.2d Cir. 2009) (appellate sanctions in civil appeals)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Davisson v. O'Brien
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Aug 8, 2012
Citations: 104 So. 3d 467; 2012 WL 3192798; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1034; No. 47,384-CA
Docket Number: No. 47,384-CA
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In