History
  • No items yet
midpage
5:12-cv-00294
M.D. Ga.
Sep 5, 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Patrick Davis, a prisoner, filed a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and sought in forma pauperis status.
  • Court granted in forma pauperis and waived initial filing fee but required payment of the full fee over time.
  • The case concerns an alleged July 21, 2010 excessive force incident by Officer Emmanuel Young during an escort.
  • Plaintiff alleges Young pinned him, struck his face/ear; Banta witnessed and promised to report and obtain medical care.
  • Plaintiff claims delayed medical treatment; he was seen August 10, 2010 and told nothing was wrong.
  • Court conducted screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and recommends proceeding only on the excessive force claim against Young.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Davis's excessive force claim against Young survives screening Davis allege Young used force against him while restrained. Young argues the complaint lacks adequate factual support for excessive force. Excessive force claim against Young may proceed.
Whether supervisory/other defendants can be held liable Other officials knew of the alleged assault and failed to intervene or prevent harm. No evidence of personal participation or policy/monetary liability by Upton, Mintz, Moore, Floyd, Powell; Banta's involvement insufficient. Dismissal of excessive force/failure-to-protect claims against Banta, Upton, Mintz, Moore, Floyd, Powell is recommended.
Whether Plaintiff's denial of medical treatment claims state a constitutional violation Plaintiff repeatedly sought medical care and was improperly denied or delayed. Plaintiff did not suffer a serious medical need or deliberate indifference; prior medical opinions found no serious injury. Plaintiff's medical-treatment claims against remaining defendants are recommended for dismissal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Carroll v. Gross, 984 F.2d 392 (11th Cir. 1993) (frivolous or meritless allegations may warrant dismissal)
  • Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346 (11th Cir. 2001) (sua sponte dismissal for lack of arguable merit)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (plausibility standard for pleading)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (threadbare recitals insufficient to state a claim)
  • Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976) (deliberate indifference standard for medical care)
  • Hill v. DeKalb Reg’l Youth Det. Ctr., 40 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 1994) (objective/subjective components of serious medical need)
  • Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994) (standard for supervisory liability in prison conditions)
  • Goebert v. Lee County, 510 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2007) (supervisory liability requires more than knowledge of wrongdoing)
  • Day v. Hall, 528 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2008) (mailbox rule for filing date in prison cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: DAVIS v. YOUNG
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Date Published: Sep 5, 2012
Citation: 5:12-cv-00294
Docket Number: 5:12-cv-00294
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Ga.
Log In
    DAVIS v. YOUNG, 5:12-cv-00294