Davis v. US Airways Group
I.C. NO. 951908.
| N.C. Indus. Comm. | Nov 23, 2010Background
- Plaintiff and Defendant-Employer had a June 1, 2008 employment relationship under the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.
- New Hampshire Insurance Company was the workers' compensation carrier on June 1, 2008.
- Plaintiff filed forms and hearings began, leading to mediation on July 9, 2009 with experienced counsel for both sides.
- During mediation, Plaintiff allegedly intoxicated and/or mentally incapacitated, potentially affecting capacity to contract, according to Plaintiff and supported by defense expert testimony.
- Two written instruments were created at mediation: a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a handwritten side agreement; both signed by the parties and transmitted by fax.
- Defendants later prepared a formal Agreement of Final Settlement and Release and a Separation Agreement; Plaintiff refused to sign, counsel withdrew, and Defendants sought enforcement of the mediated agreement.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mental capacity to contract at mediation | Plaintiff lacked capacity due to intoxication/mental state. | Sumwalt's expertise supports capacity; Plaintiff understood the act and its consequences. | Plaintiff had sufficient capacity; no lack of capacity shown. |
| Enforceability of the Mediated Settlement Agreement under Rule 502 | Handwritten side agreement and circumstances undermine enforceability. | Mediated Agreement complies with Lemly/Chaisson; valid and enforceable with proper terms. | Mediated Settlement Agreement is valid and enforceable subject to approval. |
| Validity and fairness of the ultimate Agreement of Final Settlement and Release | Agreements may be invalid due to misapprehension of retirement benefits and drafting inconsistencies. | Agreement complies with §97-17 and Rule 502; fair and just in best interests. | Final Settlement and Release is fair, just, and approved. |
| Appropriate attorney's fee for Sumwalt | Fee requested by Sumwalt was excessive or inappropriate. | Sumwalt's services warranted a $10,000 fee under §97-90. | Attorney's fee of $10,000 approved for Sumwalt. |
Key Cases Cited
- Lemly v. Colvard Oil Company, 157 N.C. App. 99, 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003) (mediated settlements can be valid if compliant with Rule 502)
- Chaisson v. Simpson, 195 N.C. App. 463, 673 S.E.2d 149 (2009) (enforcement of mediation agreements; three key elements)
- Ridings v. Ridings, 55 N.C. App. 630, 286 S.E.2d 614 (1982) (burden on party alleging mental incapacity; sane until contrary proof)
- Northington v. Michelotti, 121 N.C. App. 180, 464 S.E.2d 711 (1995) (capacity to contract requires understanding the nature of the act)
- Glenn v. McDonald's, 109 N.C. App. 45, 425 S.E.2d 727 (1993) (fraud/misrepresentation not proven; standard evidentiary considerations)
- Holden v. Boone, 153 N.C. App. 254, 569 S.E.2d 711 (2002) (general principle of jurisdiction over settlements)
- Bryant v. Dougherty, 267 N.C. 545, 148 S.E.2d 548 (1966) (statutory framework for commission approval of settlements)
