History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. State
322 Ga. App. 826
Ga. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Police charged Charles Davis with two counts of theft by deception for receiving wire-transferred funds from a Morgan County victim (G.E.) after a telephone scam.
  • G.E., while in Morgan County, was instructed to wire fees/taxes to claim a prize and sent two wire transfers to individuals in the Atlanta area, including Davis.
  • Davis lived in Marietta (Cobb County) and collected the wired funds at stores on Delk Road (Marietta) and Cobb Parkway (Smyrna) in Cobb County.
  • At trial the State elicited that G.E. wired the money from Morgan County, but offered no evidence that Davis exercised control over the funds in Morgan County.
  • Davis was convicted in Morgan County; he moved for a new trial arguing the State failed to prove venue in Morgan County.
  • The trial court denied the motion; the Court of Appeals reviewed whether the State proved venue beyond a reasonable doubt.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the State proved venue in Morgan County for theft by deception Venue proper in Morgan County because victim relinquished/wired funds from Morgan County Venue not proper because accused must have exercised control over stolen property in the prosecuting county and Davis exercised control in Cobb County, not Morgan Reversed: State failed to prove Davis exercised control over the funds in Morgan County, so venue not established there; convictions reversed but retrial allowed in proper venue

Key Cases Cited

  • Bradley v. State, 272 Ga. 740 (establishes burden to prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt)
  • Moore v. State, 153 Ga. App. 49 (theft by deception conviction reversed where prosecution failed to show accused exercised control over property in prosecuting county)
  • Naylor v. State, 257 Ga. App. 899 (reversed where victim wired funds from one county to accused in another and accused never possessed or controlled funds in the victim’s county)
  • Gautreaux v. State, 314 Ga. App. 103 (discusses when venue may be established by showing accused exercised control in the prosecuting county)
  • Hawkins v. State, 167 Ga. App. 143 (similar to Gautreaux; venue upheld where evidence showed accused exercised control in that county)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 12, 2013
Citation: 322 Ga. App. 826
Docket Number: A13A0151
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
    Davis v. State, 322 Ga. App. 826