Davis v. State
312 Ga. 870
Ga.2021Background
- On May 18, 2018, Jammie Rashad Davis shot Latravius Burks multiple times on the porch of Burks’s home; Burks later died. Davis’s three-year-old daughter and two other young children were present.
- Police found a handgun in Burks’s pocket that had not been fired recently; Burks identified “Shad” (Davis) as his shooter at the scene.
- Eyewitness testimony (including from the children) and a recorded police interview were admitted; Davis testified he acted in self-defense, claiming Burks had touched his daughter’s face and threatened/attacked him and had previously threatened him.
- Davis was indicted for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, three firearm counts, and three counts of third-degree cruelty to children; tried in July 2019, convicted, and sentenced to life plus a consecutive five-year firearm term.
- On appeal Davis argued (1) insufficiency of the evidence because his actions were justified by self-defense and (2) plain error in the trial court’s failure to charge voluntary manslaughter based on provocation by Burks.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Davis) | Defendant's Argument (State) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence (self-defense) | Evidence showed Davis acted in self-defense; convictions unsupported | Eyewitnesses, physical evidence, and Davis’s own admissions allowed the jury to reject self-defense | Affirmed — viewing evidence in favor of the verdict, a rational jury could disbelieve Davis’s self-defense claim and convict |
| Plain error for omission of voluntary manslaughter instruction | Burks’s touching of Davis’s daughter’s lips and subsequent attack constituted serious provocation requiring the charge | Brief non-sexual touching plus fighting did not obviously meet the level of provocation that mandates the charge; no controlling precedent making omission plain error | Affirmed — no plain error; the touching and fighting did not obviously require a voluntary manslaughter instruction |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (establishes standard for sufficiency of evidence review)
- Dugger v. State, 297 Ga. 120 (explains when slight evidence of serious provocation requires voluntary manslaughter charge)
- Scott v. State, 291 Ga. 156 (molestation-taunt can require manslaughter instruction)
- Corley v. State, 308 Ga. 321 (jury may reject justification defenses)
- Walter v. State, 304 Ga. 760 (plain-error requires controlling authority to show error is obvious)
- Jackson v. State, 301 Ga. 878 (distinguishes provocation vs. self-defense contexts)
- Smith v. State, 296 Ga. 731 (fear of gun or fighting alone not warrant manslaughter charge)
- Morris v. State, 303 Ga. 192 (plain-error framework for jury-charge claims)
- Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (vacatur of felony murder by operation of law)
