Davis v. State
312 Ga. App. 328
Ga. Ct. App.2011Background
- Victim at home with two daughters; someone tries doorknob and then enters with multiple men, one masked with a gun.
- Victim fires at the gunman during the struggle; weapons are exchanged and the gunman is wounded; accomplices flee.
- DNA from the ski mask used in the struggle matches Davis; victim and daughters identify Davis as the gunman.
- Davis tells detective he was shot during a robbery attempt; cellmate later testifies Davis claimed to have been involved in a separate incident.
- Trial court convict Davis of burglary, aggravated assault, attempted armed robbery, and firearm possession; appeal challenges merger, impeachment ruling, and effectiveness of counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merger of offenses | Davis: aggravated assault not included in armed robbery. | State: separate completed offenses; no merger. | Trial court erred by not merging the offenses. |
| Impeachment scope for cellmate | Cellmate pending probation revocation should be admitted to show bias. | No further impeachment beyond 'in jail' allowed. | Court limited impeachment; error not grounds to reverse alone. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | Counsel should have widened impeachment; bias evidence admissible. | Outcome would not differ; overwhelming evidence. | No reasonable probability of different outcome; no reversible error. |
Key Cases Cited
- Reed v. State, 293 Ga.App. 479 (Ga.App. 2008) (test for one offense includes same evidence rule)
- Young v. State, 272 Ga.App. 304 (Ga.App. 2005) (merger analysis when acts/transactions overlap)
- Melson v. State, 263 Ga.App. 647 (Ga.App. 2003) (impeachment via bias evidence from ongoing charges)
- Davis v. State, 269 Ga. 276 (Ga. 1998) (first offender records not admissible for general impeachment)
- Haynes v. State, 199 Ga.App. 288 (Ga.App. 1991) (impeachment limitations; procedural default rule)
- Butler v. State, 285 Ga. 518 (Ga. 2009) (procedural default rules on preserving objections)
