History
  • No items yet
midpage
67 So. 3d 1125
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Davis timely appeals judgment and sentences for possession of drug paraphernalia, cannabis (<=20g), and concealed weapon by a felon.
  • Contraband discovered during a protective patdown by Officer McConnell.
  • Date/time: November 24, 2009, about 2:46 p.m., in a courtyard of a high-crime area complex.
  • McConnell approached a group; Davis walked away and then spoke briefly to the officer.
  • Officer felt a pocketknife in Davis' pocket; he secured it and conducted a patdown, revealing brass knuckles in a bag and drugs/person(contraband) on Davis.
  • Defense acknowledged the patdown was without Davis' consent; knife was lawful and not itself unlawful.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the patdown transformed the encounter into an investigatory stop requiring reasonable suspicion Davis Davis Yes; the investigatory stop required reasonable suspicion

Key Cases Cited

  • Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993) (consensual encounter vs. investigatory stop; articulable suspicion required)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968) (limits on police detentions and searches with suspicion)
  • Kramer v. State, 15 So.3d 790 (Fla.5th DCA 2009) (analysis of when a stop becomes investigatory)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 22, 2011
Citations: 67 So. 3d 1125; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410; 2011 WL 2923699; 5D10-2096
Docket Number: 5D10-2096
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Davis v. State, 67 So. 3d 1125