History
  • No items yet
midpage
154 So. 3d 643
La. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Daffney Davis leased condo unit #381 in Riverside Court Condominiums; on Jan. 21, 2011 she was severely scalded by bathwater and suffered extensive burns.
  • Plaintiff sued unit owner/lessor Gulf Property Investments, L.L.C. (GPI), the condominium association (RCCA), the association's insurer, and a plumbing contractor, asserting strict liability, negligence, and breach of lessor’s warranty.
  • GPI moved for summary judgment arguing it lacked custody/control of the central hot-water system (a common element), the lease waived lessor warranties, and GPI had no notice of any defect; plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment on liability.
  • The Declaration and RCCA bylaws allocated maintenance/operation of central services (including boilers/hot-water) to the association; only RCCA employees had access to locked boiler rooms; GPI owned only a fractional interest in common elements.
  • Trial court granted GPI’s summary judgment and denied plaintiff’s partial summary judgment; on de novo review the appellate court affirmed, finding GPI lacked custody/control and notice to impose strict liability or negligence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Strict liability under art. 2317/2317.1 — custody/garde of the dangerous thing GPI, as unit owner/lessor, is strictly liable for defects on the premises and cannot avoid liability by pointing to common-element origin; lessor warranties apply The overheated water came from a central hot-water system that is a common element under RCCA control; GPI lacked custody/control so cannot be strictly liable GPI is not strictly liable: plaintiff failed to show GPI had custody/control of the hot-water system
Lessor’s warranty and waiver (C.C. arts. 2696–2699; La. R.S. 9:3221) Lease waiver is ineffective or inapplicable because tenant could not control central boiler and defect implicated health/safety Lease contained a waiver of responsibility; even so, GPI lacked custody and had no notice; waiver ineffective only for defects seriously affecting health/safety but plaintiff didn’t overcome custody/notice problems Waiver argument insufficient to impose liability; absence of custody/notice dispositive
Negligence — notice and opportunity to remedy GPI owed duty to inspect/maintain and should have known about overheating; failed to warn or repair GPI had no access/control of boilers and no complaints/notice; RCCA employees performed temperature checks; no evidence GPI knew or should have known No genuine issue of material fact on notice; GPI entitled to judgment as a matter of law
Statutory insurance and unit-owner liability (La. R.S. 9:1123.112) Association insurance statute implies unit owners bear liability for common-element risks Inclusion of unit owners as insureds in association policy does not create substantive liability where owner lacks custody/control Statute/insurance does not impute liability to GPI absent proof of custody/control or fault
Adequacy of discovery Plaintiff contends key witness (former RCCA employee) not deposed; summary judgment premature Plaintiff had multiple years for discovery; no showing deposition would create facts tying GPI to custody/notice No probable injustice shown; summary judgment not delayed; plaintiff failed to identify material facts that would preclude judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • Dupree v. City of New Orleans, 765 So.2d 1002 (La. 2000) (custody/garde, not mere ownership, governs art. 2317 liability)
  • Graubarth v. French Market Corp., 970 So.2d 660 (La. App. 4th Cir.) (custody/garde may be shared; focus on right of direction/control)
  • Jones v. Peyton Place, Inc., 675 So.2d 754 (La. App. 4th Cir.) (elements required to establish liability under arts. 2317/2317.1)
  • Wiggins v. Ledet, 648 So.2d 797 (La. App. 4th Cir.) (owner’s duty to keep property reasonably safe and to discover/uncover hazards; knowledge required)
  • Blackwell v. Hanover Ins. Co., 551 So.2d 47 (La. App. 1st Cir.) (liability allocation between unit owner and association for limited/common elements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 12, 2014
Citations: 154 So. 3d 643; 2014 WL 5861224; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2733; 2014 La.App. 4 Cir. 0023; No. 2014-CA-0023
Docket Number: No. 2014-CA-0023
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc., 154 So. 3d 643