735 S.E.2d 259
W. Va.2012Background
- Davis seeks to prohibit enforcement of a circuit court order dismissing one count of felony murder from Sands' indictment.
- Trial court dismissed felony-murder count on the theory that a co-perpetrator could not be convicted where the intended burglary victim killed the co-perp.
- Sands was indicted for felony murder, attempted nighttime burglary, and conspiracy related to a December 12, 2011 burglary attempt at a Weirton, WV store; the store owner's son killed Dakota Givens.
- The court relied on a majority/minority debate across states and ultimately adopted the dissenting view that felony murder does not extend to a co-perp killed by the intended victim.
- The issue centers on the interpretation of WV Code § 61-2-1 and the common-law foundation of felony murder in West Virginia.
- Court concludes that felony murder does not apply to a co-perp killed by the intended burglary victim; writ of prohibition denied.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether felony murder extends to a co-perp killed by the intended victim | Davis contends the statute permits broad application. | Sands/Sands' position relies on common-law foundations and statutory language to allow broader reach. | Felony murder does not extend to the co-perp killed by the intended victim. |
| Proper interpretation of WV Code § 61-2-1 and its relation to common law | Statutory text supports broader felony-murder liability. | Statute remains grounded in common-law murder definitions and limits. | Statutory felony murder remains anchored in common law and does not cover this co-perp scenario. |
| Whether the circuit court erred in stating the elements of felony murder | Court mischaracterized the elements, expanding beyond the statute. | Elements align with Mayle/Sims framework and WV case law. | No clear error; elements as stated are correct under WV law. |
| Whether the writ of prohibition should issue | Petitioner seeks to prevent improper application of the felony-murder rule. | There is no error justifying prohibition given the control of the circuit court. | Writ denied. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Sims, 162 W.Va. 212, 248 S.E.2d 834 (1978) (defines felony murder elements and WV approach)
- State ex rel. Hoover v. Berger, 199 W.Va. 12, 483 S.E.2d 12 (1996) (five-factor test for writs of prohibition)
- Painter v. Zakaib, 186 W.Va. 82, 411 S.E.2d 25 (1991) (discusses status of co-conspirator deaths and statute interpretation)
- Mayle, 178 W.Va. 26, 357 S.E.2d 219 (1987) (syllabus on felony-murder elements)
- State v. Williams, 172 W.Va. 295, 305 S.E.2d 251 (1983) (elements of felony murder and de-emphasis of malice requirement)
- Commonwealth v. Redline, 391 Pa. 486, 137 A.2d 472 (1958) (imputed malice and limitations on co-perp killings)
- Wooden v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 758, 284 S.E.2d 811 (1981) (majority view limiting felony murder when victim co-perpels)
- People v. Washington, 62 Cal.2d 777, 402 P.2d 130 (1965) (criticisms of felony-murder doctrine and narrow application)
