Davidson v. Howe
749 F.3d 21
| 1st Cir. | 2014Background
- Marilyn Davidson, an intellectually disabled ward, has been in Massachusetts DDS care since 1949, most recently at Fernald; Fernald was planned for closure due to noncompliance with ADA and cost; DDS planned to transfer Marilyn from Fernald to Wrentham after state adjudication and administrative appeals exhausted; federal suit filed Oct 18, 2013 seeking to enjoin the transfer under Medicaid Act regulations; district court denied injunction on private-right-of-action grounds but allowed amended complaint; Marilyn was transferred Oct 22, 2013 and remains at Wrentham; the appellate court later held mootness and Eleventh Amendment immunity issues and remanded for dismissal of damages and mootness without addressing private right question.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether injunctive/declaratory relief is moot | Davidsons: not moot due to ongoing concerns | Commonwealth: transfer completed, no live dispute | Injunctive/declaratory claims moot |
| Whether damages claim is barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity | N/A | State immunity bars damages in federal court | Damages claim barred by Eleventh Amendment |
| Whether Medicaid Act creates a private right of action to challenge transfers | Davidsons contend private right exists | State asserts no private right of action | Not addressed on appeal (not reached) |
Key Cases Cited
- American Civil Liberties Union of Mass. v. U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, 705 F.3d 44 (1st Cir. 2013) (mootness; actual controversy required; dismissal when no live case)
- Ricci v. Patrick, 544 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2008) (state consent and Ricci decree framework; ISP disputes resolved in state process)
- Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974) (Eleventh Amendment bars suits against states in federal court)
- Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000) (Congressional abrogation of immunity requires clear express language)
- Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969) (live case requirement; mootness)
