History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davet v. Sensenbrenner
2012 Ohio 5898
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Foreclosure action on Davet's property was initiated by the former county treasurer for nonpayment of taxes.
  • A tax magistrate ordered foreclosure; sheriff's sale scheduled for Feb 2009; sale did not occur and property forfeited to the state.
  • Auditor became custodian with authority to sell the property under statute.
  • Davet challenged standing and sought relief in federal court; federal court lacked jurisdiction to interfere and dismissed for lack of adequate state remedy.
  • Davet filed motions to vacate/dismiss; trial court denied; Davet appealed and later filed a separate action in trial court raising the same standing arguments.
  • Boston moved for summary judgment based on res judicata; magistrate recommended summary judgment for Boston; trial court adopted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment for Boston based on res judicata. Davet argues Rokakis lacked standing; foreclosure void ab initio and warrants relief. Boston asserts Davet should have appealed the foreclosure judgment; claims preclusion bars new actions. Yes, affirmed; res judicata bars Davet's claims and summary judgment for Boston proper.

Key Cases Cited

  • Davet v. Mikhli, 8th Dist. No. 97291, 2012-Ohio-1200 (8th Dist. (Ohio 2012)) (claim preclusion bars lodging challenges to foreclosure in separate actions)
  • Davet v. Fed. Natl. Mtge. Assn., 8th Dist. No. 97890, 2012-Ohio-3575 (8th Dist. (Ohio 2012)) (precedent for same standing arguments in foreclosure context)
  • State ex rel. Squire v. Kofron, 58 Ohio App. 65, 15 N.E.2d 783 (8th Dist.1937) (foreclosure requires necessary parties with title or interest)
  • Hembree v. Mid-America Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 64 Ohio App.3d 144, 580 N.E.2d 1103 (2d Dist.1989) (necessary-party doctrine in foreclosure actions)
  • Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Schwartzwald, 2012-Ohio-5017 (Ohio) (mortgage holder must own the mortgage to file foreclosure)
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jordan, 8th Dist. No. 91675, 2009-Ohio-1092 (8th Dist. (Ohio 2009)) (standing and foreclosure proceedings)
  • Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Triplett, 8th Dist. No. 94924, 2011-Ohio-478 (8th Dist. (Ohio 2011)) (standing issues in foreclosure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Davet v. Sensenbrenner
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 13, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 5898
Docket Number: 98636
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.