Darrell A. Williams v. State of Indaina (mem. dec.)
79A04-1602-CR-410
| Ind. Ct. App. | Nov 7, 2016Background
- On May 5, 2012, Darrell A. Williams caused significant damage to another vehicle in Tippecanoe County and drove away; a witness photographed his plate and the rental records linked the car to Williams.
- Police discovered Williams’ driving privileges had been suspended for life; he was charged with operating a motor vehicle after lifetime forfeiture (Class C felony) and failure to stop after an accident resulting in property damage (Class C misdemeanor).
- Williams requested a jury trial but pleaded guilty on the morning of trial after jurors were seated; he later failed to appear for post-plea hearings and fled the state for over two years until arrested in Chicago.
- At sentencing the court imposed an aggregate five-year sentence: two years executed in DOC, one year community corrections, two years suspended on probation; the misdemeanor sentence (60 days) ran concurrently.
- Williams appealed, arguing his sentence was inappropriate under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B); the State defended the sentence based on Williams’ extensive criminal history and conduct.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the sentence is inappropriate under Ind. App. R. 7(B) | State: sentence is proper given Williams’ criminal history and flight | Williams: sentence excessive; asks reduction to four years | Court affirmed: sentence not inappropriate in light of offense and offender |
Key Cases Cited
- Anglemyer v. State, 868 N.E.2d 482 (Ind. 2007) (establishes standard of review for sentencing and appellate review authority)
- Anglemyer v. State, 875 N.E.2d 218 (Ind. 2007) (clarification on sentencing review framework)
- Gibson v. State, 43 N.E.3d 231 (Ind. 2015) (Appellate Rule 7(B) review aims to correct outlier sentences, not to reweigh every case)
- Keller v. State, 987 N.E.2d 1099 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (factors for assessing sentence appropriateness include culpability, severity, and harm)
- Williams v. State, 51 N.E.3d 1205 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) (character of the offender may be assessed broadly and prior convictions are relevant)
