History
  • No items yet
midpage
Darrell A. Williams v. State of Indaina (mem. dec.)
79A04-1602-CR-410
| Ind. Ct. App. | Nov 7, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On May 5, 2012, Darrell A. Williams caused significant damage to another vehicle in Tippecanoe County and drove away; a witness photographed his plate and the rental records linked the car to Williams.
  • Police discovered Williams’ driving privileges had been suspended for life; he was charged with operating a motor vehicle after lifetime forfeiture (Class C felony) and failure to stop after an accident resulting in property damage (Class C misdemeanor).
  • Williams requested a jury trial but pleaded guilty on the morning of trial after jurors were seated; he later failed to appear for post-plea hearings and fled the state for over two years until arrested in Chicago.
  • At sentencing the court imposed an aggregate five-year sentence: two years executed in DOC, one year community corrections, two years suspended on probation; the misdemeanor sentence (60 days) ran concurrently.
  • Williams appealed, arguing his sentence was inappropriate under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B); the State defended the sentence based on Williams’ extensive criminal history and conduct.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the sentence is inappropriate under Ind. App. R. 7(B) State: sentence is proper given Williams’ criminal history and flight Williams: sentence excessive; asks reduction to four years Court affirmed: sentence not inappropriate in light of offense and offender

Key Cases Cited

  • Anglemyer v. State, 868 N.E.2d 482 (Ind. 2007) (establishes standard of review for sentencing and appellate review authority)
  • Anglemyer v. State, 875 N.E.2d 218 (Ind. 2007) (clarification on sentencing review framework)
  • Gibson v. State, 43 N.E.3d 231 (Ind. 2015) (Appellate Rule 7(B) review aims to correct outlier sentences, not to reweigh every case)
  • Keller v. State, 987 N.E.2d 1099 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (factors for assessing sentence appropriateness include culpability, severity, and harm)
  • Williams v. State, 51 N.E.3d 1205 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) (character of the offender may be assessed broadly and prior convictions are relevant)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Darrell A. Williams v. State of Indaina (mem. dec.)
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 7, 2016
Docket Number: 79A04-1602-CR-410
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.