History
  • No items yet
midpage
Darious Fabriese Lindsey v. State
01-15-00649-CR
| Tex. App. | Oct 6, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Officers surveilled a known crack house; a car parked in the driveway for several minutes then left; officers followed it.
  • During the follow, the driver failed to stop at a stop sign and turned without signaling; officers stopped the vehicle.
  • The driver lacked a driver’s license/ID and was arrested and placed in the patrol car.
  • Officer Turrentine ordered passenger Darious Lindsey out of the car; Lindsey appeared nervous and admitted to carrying an alprazolam bottle without a prescription.
  • The officer inspected the bottle and found two rocks of crack cocaine; officers field-tested and seized the drugs.
  • Lindsey moved to suppress the cocaine and testimony, arguing the passenger was unlawfully detained after the traffic stop ended; the trial court denied suppression and convicted Lindsey of possession.

Issues and Key Cases Cited

Issue Lindsey's Argument State's Argument Held
Whether ordering passenger to exit car violated Fourth Amendment because stop was completed Ordering Lindsey out occurred after stop completed and thus was unlawful Stop had not been completed: driver was arrested, vehicle not secured, passenger could be ordered out for officer safety Court held order lawful: stop ongoing when officer required Lindsey to exit
Whether officers had reasonable suspicion to detain Lindsey for questioning No reasonable suspicion; nervousness alone insufficient and no connection to crime Totality (parking at known crack house, brief stay, following, driver lacking ID, Lindsey’s nervousness) gave reasonable suspicion Court held reasonable suspicion existed to detain Lindsey for questioning
Whether officers had probable cause to search/seize drugs after Lindsey’s statement No probable cause prior to search/seizure Once Lindsey admitted possessing unprescribed alprazolam, officers had probable cause to search and seize cocaine found in bottle Court held admission provided probable cause; search/seizure lawful

Key Cases Cited

  • Ford v. State, 158 S.W.3d 488 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (standard of review for suppression rulings)
  • Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997) (officers may order passengers out of vehicle during traffic stop for safety)
  • Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015) (traffic stop may not be extended beyond mission without reasonable suspicion)
  • Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009) (traffic stop ends when police have no further need to control scene; passenger may be ordered out during stop)
  • St. George v. State, 237 S.W.3d 720 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (requesting ID from passenger after completed stop impermissible without reasonable suspicion)
  • Green v. State, 256 S.W.3d 456 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008) (presence at known drug house and nervous behavior can support probable cause/reasonable suspicion)
  • Matthews v. State, 431 S.W.3d 596 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (reasonable suspicion defined and evaluated under totality of circumstances)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Darious Fabriese Lindsey v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 6, 2016
Docket Number: 01-15-00649-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.