History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel Hall v. Carolyn Colvin
778 F.3d 688
| 7th Cir. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Hall applied for social security disability benefits in 2010, after decade-long pain from ankle, back, and knee injuries and related conditions.
  • The ALJ found Hall not totally disabled but severely impaired by ankle ligament tear, obesity, and knee meniscus tear.
  • Hall’s VA rating was 70% disabled with a finding of total unemployability by the VA, which the ALJ acknowledged but deemed not controlling due to SSA criteria.
  • Diagnostic evidence included multiple imaging studies showing various issues; MRI evidence (particularly MRI after the hearing) emerged but did not influence the decision.
  • The ALJ discounted Hall’s testimony and some doctor opinions, and stressed the lack of objective diagnostic confirmation via imaging as justification to deny total disability.
  • The district court denied review, and the case was appealed to the court, which reversed and remanded for new proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Credibility and need for objective tests for pain Hall's pain credible; lack of MRI should not bar benefits per SSR 96-7p. ALJ properly required objective testing to support pain claims. Remand required; error in denying benefits without adequate evidence.
Weight given to VA disability determination VA finding of total unemployability supports SSA disability. SSA and VA criteria differ; VA finding not controlling. Remand; the ALJ inadequately weighed the VA determination.
Use of MRI and medical opinions Earlier MRIs showed problems; ALJ should have ordered MRI or consulted medical expert. Existing medical opinions and tests provide enough basis for decision. Remand; failure to obtain MRI and to analyze medical evidence undermines substantial evidence.

Key Cases Cited

  • McCartey v. Massanari, 298 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2002) (pain criteria and SSA disability interpretation)
  • Pierce v. Colvin, 739 F.3d 1046 (7th Cir. 2014) (credibility and lack of objective evidence for pain not fatal to credibility)
  • Carradine v. Barnhart, 360 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2004) (objective evidence not sole basis to deny pain claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel Hall v. Carolyn Colvin
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Feb 20, 2015
Citation: 778 F.3d 688
Docket Number: 14-2498
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.