Daniel E. McBrayer, Sr. v. Governors Ridge Office Park Association, Inc.
A21A0262
| Ga. Ct. App. | Jun 15, 2021Background:
- McBrayer operated Alpha OBGYN (including abortion services) from a unit in Governors Ridge office park, a commercially zoned development that houses other medical practices.
- Protestors regularly gathered outside the park, sometimes harassing invitees and displaying graphic signs; one suspicious fire occurred at McBrayer’s building in 2012.
- Governors Ridge owners complained in the late 1990s and 2000s about loitering, littering, and bodily "voiding" in common areas they attributed to McBrayer’s patients; the association invoked Declaration Section 9.09 and assessed daily sanctions beginning in 2010.
- Governors Ridge sued in 2013 alleging nuisance and breach of the Declaration; a jury awarded over $1.17 million plus attorney fees; the trial court denied McBrayer’s motion for new trial.
- On appeal the Court of Appeals reversed the denial of the motion for new trial, holding key theories of liability lacked evidentiary support and remanded for further proceedings.
Issues:
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether lawful operation of an abortion clinic can be a common-law nuisance because it offends neighbors and attracts protests | Governors Ridge: The clinic’s nature is offensive, disrupted commerce, and is "out of character" for the park, constituting a nuisance | McBrayer: Clinic is lawfully operating in properly zoned office park and did not unlawfully conduct services | Held: Reversed — lawful, properly zoned conduct that merely offends or attracts protestors is not a nuisance absent unlawful or intrusive operations |
| Whether fear of violence (single fire; violence at other clinics) supports nuisance liability | Governors Ridge: Fire and awareness of violence at other clinics made owners fear for safety, creating nuisance | McBrayer: Single incident and remote events elsewhere do not create a continuing nuisance linked to his property | Held: Reversed — a single incident and crimes elsewhere do not establish a continuous nuisance or legal basis for liability |
| Whether loitering, littering, and bodily voiding by clinic invitees constituted nuisance | Governors Ridge: Invitees loitered, littered, and committed bodily voiding in common areas, harming use and value | McBrayer: Evidence did not show unlawful loitering or connect invitees to littering/voiding with sufficient frequency or proof | Held: Mixed — "loitering" (waiting in cars) not shown to meet loitering statute; littering/voiding lacked evidentiary connection but could be proven on retrial |
| Whether Declaration Section 9.09 supports liability for the claimed conduct | Governors Ridge: Covenant prohibits nuisances/embarrassment/annoyance and permits sanctions; McBrayer breached it | McBrayer: Covenants must be clear; restrictions construed narrowly and cannot ban lawful uses simply because offensive | Held: Reversed as to broad enforcement — covenant is enforceable only to the extent the conduct fits common-law nuisance; vague provisions cannot be used to recover absent nuisance-level conduct (but littering/voiding (if proven) could breach the Declaration) |
Key Cases Cited
- Cook v. Huff, 274 Ga. 186 (appellate standard for reviewing denial of new trial on general grounds)
- Terry v. Catherall, 337 Ga. App. 902 (definition of nuisance and requirement of control over cause)
- City of Douglasville v. Queen, 270 Ga. 770 (lawful conduct cannot be a nuisance unless conducted illegally or in a nuisance manner)
- Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co., 188 Ga. 498 (offensiveness alone insufficient to constitute nuisance)
- Effingham County Bd. of Comm’rs v. Shuler Bros., 265 Ga. App. 754 (lawfully authorized business not a nuisance)
- Anderson v. Atlanta Comm. for Olympic Games, Inc., 261 Ga. App. 895 (legally operated facility not a nuisance simply because it attracts crime)
- Poultryland, Inc. v. Anderson, 200 Ga. 549 (lawful act in wrong place can be nuisance; context limited to neighborhood/residential conflicts)
- Douglas v. Wages, 271 Ga. 616 (restrictive covenants must be clear and are strictly construed)
- Barnes v. St. Stephen’s Missionary Baptist Church, 260 Ga. App. 765 (single isolated occurrence does not establish nuisance)
- City of Atlanta v. Murphy, 194 Ga. App. 652 (nuisance established where operation violated regulations and attracted vermin/odors)
