History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dan Woodley Communities, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank
310 Ga. App. 656
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Woodley appeals the superior court's confirmation of a foreclosure sale of a condominium development.
  • Woodley argues the advertisement was legally deficient for not noting six or seven units were sold prior to foreclosure.
  • The court follows Southeast Timberlands v. Security Nat. Bank and held such defects do not invalidate the sale if bidding was not chilled and the sale brought fair market value.
  • The advertisement described the property with metes and bounds, the plat's book and page, and noted items that may affect title, and stated the sale was subject to such matters.
  • The four-week advertisement could not reflect very recent unit sales; units were identified as excepted on the courthouse steps, and counsel reiterated the sale was 'as advertised less and excepting any matters of record.'
  • The trial court found the advertisement conformed to Georgia law and that the property brought its fair market value; the appellate court affirmed the sale.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an advertisement defect invalidates sale Woodley: defect nullifies sale due to incomplete description SunTrust: defects do not invalidate if not chilling bidding and FMV achieved No reversible error; sale upheld
Whether the advertisement's failure to note unit pre-sales chilled bidding Woodley claims bidding was chilled by improper ad SunTrust contends no chilling effect proved; FMV established No chilling effect shown; sale reasonable price reached

Key Cases Cited

  • Southeast Timberlands v. Security Nat. Bank, 220 Ga. App. 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996) (advertisement defects may not chill bidding; FMV controls)
  • Scroggins v. Harper, 138 Ga. App. 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976) (no legal requirement to include all deeds in ad; effect on sale fact-dependent)
  • Norwood Realty Co. v. First Fed., etc. Assn., 99 Ga. App. 692 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959) (advertisement remains sufficient despite omitted lots)
  • Atreus Communities of America v. KeyBank Nat. Assn., 307 Ga. App. 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011) (trial court credibility and weight of evidence upheld on confirmation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dan Woodley Communities, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 7, 2011
Citation: 310 Ga. App. 656
Docket Number: A11A0365
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.