History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 IL App (5th) 130361
Ill. App. Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Dale, a bus driver for South Central, injury occurred July 31, 2009, with medical disagreement about recommended surgery.
  • Dale elected non-surgical management; dispute over claim timing allegedly delayed by employer.
  • Dale was on 12-week FMLA leave; he was terminated March 4, 2010 for being medically unable to return.
  • Dale filed a workers’ compensation claim October 9, 2009; settlement reached September 11, 2012, with lump-sum payment and medical benefits.
  • Dale filed a retaliatory discharge claim November 19, 2010; South Central sought partial SJ on lost wages.
  • Trial court granted partial SJ; circuit court certified two questions about exclusivity and lost wages; this court granted interlocutory appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether lost wages due to WC-delay are exclusive to the Act. Dale argues exclusivity should not bar lost wages from retaliatory discharge. South Central argues exclusivity controls; lost wages not recoverable in civil action. Lost wages fall within the Act’s exclusivity.
Whether termination while totally incapacitated due to employer delay in treatment falls outside exclusivity. Dale contends delay-caused incapacity allows civil recovery for lost wages. Employer delay does not circumvent exclusivity; damages limited to Act remedies. Lost wages are within exclusivity; civil recovery barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ocasek v. Krass, 153 Ill. App. 3d 215 (1987) (exclusive remedy under Act for on-the-job injuries)
  • Garland v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 2013 IL App (1st) 112121 (2013) (requires specific intent to injure to defeat exclusivity)
  • Collier v. Wagner Castings Co., 81 Ill. 2d 229 (1980) (four-part test for exclusivity application)
  • Keating v. 68th & Paxton, L.L.C., 401 Ill. App. 3d 456 (2010) (exclusive remedy for injuries arises from Act)
  • Meerbrey v. Marshall Field & Co., 139 Ill. 2d 455 (1990) (exclusive remedy concept as quid pro quo)
  • Siekierka v. United Steel Deck, Inc., 373 Ill. App. 3d 214 (2007) (causation and exclusivity in Act context)
  • Land & Lakes Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 359 Ill. App. 3d 582 (2005) (causation standard in Act context)
  • National Freight Industries v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, 2013 IL App (5th) 120043WC (2013) (natural consequence doctrine within Act framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dale v. South Central Illinois Mass Transit
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Sep 29, 2014
Citations: 2014 IL App (5th) 130361; 17 N.E.3d 229; 384 Ill. Dec. 656; 5-13-0361
Docket Number: 5-13-0361
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Dale v. South Central Illinois Mass Transit, 2014 IL App (5th) 130361