History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curtis v. US Bank National Ass'n
427 Md. 526
Md.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • PTFA requires at least 90 days advance notice to bona fide tenants after foreclosure; Maryland parallel RP 7-105.6 provides similar protections and procedural specifics.
  • Foreclosure involved a residential property in Maryland where USBNA foreclosed on Price’s deed of trust and took title; Curtis continued occupancy as a tenant.
  • USBNA sent post-sale notices that were conflicting: one urging immediate vacate while signaling possible bona fide tenant rights, and a separate 90-day notice.
  • Curtis challenged the notices and moved to intervene; USBNA filed a motion for possession under Maryland Rule 14-102 asserting immediate possession rights.
  • Circuit Court granted USBNA’s motion; Curtis appealed, arguing notices were defective and the motion premature under PTFA and Maryland rules.
  • Court holds that misleading notices fail to satisfy PTFA, motion premature if there is no immediate right to possession, and reverses/remands for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether USBNA’s notices satisfied PTFA and Maryland requirements Curtis USBNA No; notices were misleading/defective.
Whether USBNA had an immediate right to possession at filing Curtis USBNA No; USBNA lacked immediate possession rights when filing.
Whether the possession motion was premature Curtis USBNA Yes; motion premature under PTFA and rules.
Whether the tenancy qualifies as bona fide under PTFA/RP Curtis USBNA Bona fide status not dispositive given defective notices and premature motion.

Key Cases Cited

  • Legacy Funding LLC v. Cohn, 396 Md. 511 (Md. 2007) (landlord-tenant rights post-foreclosure; possession standards under RP § 7-105.6)
  • Southern Md. Oil v. Kaminetz, 272 A.2d 641 (Md. 1971) (tenancy rights when mortgage precedes lease)
  • Kessler v. Equity Management, Inc., 82 Md.App. 577 (Md. 1990) (tenants’ possessory rights against landlords)
  • Fontaine v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 372 S.W.3d 257 (Tex.Ct.App.2012) (foreign PTFA-like holdings; tenancy rights after foreclosure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Curtis v. US Bank National Ass'n
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Aug 20, 2012
Citation: 427 Md. 526
Docket Number: No. 96
Court Abbreviation: Md.