History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cupertino Union School District v. K.A.
5:13-cv-04659
| N.D. Cal. | Dec 22, 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • K.A. is a 12-year-old with regressive autism eligible as a student with autistic-like behaviors.
  • In April 2012, K.A. suffered seizures; the district denied a 1:1 aide but invited an IEP meeting to discuss needs.
  • May 31, 2012, an emergency IEP was held; district required a doctor’s note to place a student on home-hospital instruction and did not offer it absent such note.
  • The district offered an aide for the full school day but no bus aide; no home-hospital instruction was provided at that meeting.
  • A June 8, 2012 IEP superseded the May 31 offer; the court later found issues with the May 31 decision.
  • The Court affirmed the ALJ’s ruling that there was no deprivation of FAPE on May 31, 2012 due to lack of a compliant physician’s note.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the District deny FAPE by denying home-hospital instruction on May 31, 2012? Father argues reliance on district’s 1:1 aide offer excused the note. District required a compliant medical report before home instruction could be recommended. Issue affirmed; no FAPE denial due to lack of compliant medical note.

Key Cases Cited

  • E.M. ex rel. E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified Sch. Dist. Office of Admin. Hearings, 652 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2011) (preeminent standard for handling additional evidence and deference in IDEA appeals)
  • Van Duyn ex rel. Van Duyn v. Baker Sch. Dist. 5J, 481 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. 2007) (due weight to state proceedings and credibility findings)
  • Ojai Unified Sch. Dist. v. Jackson, 4 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1993) (requirement to give deference to hearing officer’s determinations)
  • Capistrano Unified Sch. Dist. v. Wartenberg, 59 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 1995) (practical approach to evaluating administrative decisions)
  • Union Sch. Dist. v. Smith, 15 F.3d 1519 (9th Cir. 1994) (thorough and careful findings warrant deference)
  • Amanda J. ex rel. Annette J. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 267 F.3d 877 (9th Cir. 2001) (credibility evaluations in live-witness testimony)
  • Schaffer ex rel. Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49 (2005) (broader burden-shifting framework in IDEA context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cupertino Union School District v. K.A.
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Dec 22, 2014
Docket Number: 5:13-cv-04659
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.