Cupertino Union School District v. K.A.
5:13-cv-04659
| N.D. Cal. | Dec 22, 2014Background
- K.A. is a 12-year-old with regressive autism eligible as a student with autistic-like behaviors.
- In April 2012, K.A. suffered seizures; the district denied a 1:1 aide but invited an IEP meeting to discuss needs.
- May 31, 2012, an emergency IEP was held; district required a doctor’s note to place a student on home-hospital instruction and did not offer it absent such note.
- The district offered an aide for the full school day but no bus aide; no home-hospital instruction was provided at that meeting.
- A June 8, 2012 IEP superseded the May 31 offer; the court later found issues with the May 31 decision.
- The Court affirmed the ALJ’s ruling that there was no deprivation of FAPE on May 31, 2012 due to lack of a compliant physician’s note.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Did the District deny FAPE by denying home-hospital instruction on May 31, 2012? | Father argues reliance on district’s 1:1 aide offer excused the note. | District required a compliant medical report before home instruction could be recommended. | Issue affirmed; no FAPE denial due to lack of compliant medical note. |
Key Cases Cited
- E.M. ex rel. E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified Sch. Dist. Office of Admin. Hearings, 652 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2011) (preeminent standard for handling additional evidence and deference in IDEA appeals)
- Van Duyn ex rel. Van Duyn v. Baker Sch. Dist. 5J, 481 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. 2007) (due weight to state proceedings and credibility findings)
- Ojai Unified Sch. Dist. v. Jackson, 4 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1993) (requirement to give deference to hearing officer’s determinations)
- Capistrano Unified Sch. Dist. v. Wartenberg, 59 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 1995) (practical approach to evaluating administrative decisions)
- Union Sch. Dist. v. Smith, 15 F.3d 1519 (9th Cir. 1994) (thorough and careful findings warrant deference)
- Amanda J. ex rel. Annette J. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 267 F.3d 877 (9th Cir. 2001) (credibility evaluations in live-witness testimony)
- Schaffer ex rel. Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49 (2005) (broader burden-shifting framework in IDEA context)
