History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cruz v. State
2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2232
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Julio Cruz filed an emergency petition for writ of prohibition seeking to halt Broward County proceedings until the proper immunity-determination procedure under §776.032, Fla. Stat. (2009) is resolved.
  • Cruz was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and moved for dismissal based on statutory immunity.
  • The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, relying on Velasquez v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) regarding Rule 3.190(c)(4) and disputed facts.
  • The Velasquez decision certified a conflict with Peterson v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) about pretrial immunity procedures and burdens of proof.
  • Dennis v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) presented the issue on review, with the court initially denying the immunity-dismissal approach in Dennis.
  • The Florida Supreme Court resolved the conflict by adopting Peterson and Dennis’s approach, prompting the current petition grant directing adherence to that standard.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
What is the proper pretrial procedure for immunity under §776.032? Cruz argues for Peterson/Dennis approach. State supports pretrial dismissal only when no factual disputes exist. The trial court must apply Peterson/Dennis pretrial procedure.
Should the defendant bear the burden and prove immunity by a preponderance of the evidence pretrial? Cruz supports burden-set by pretrial rule. State contends for established pretrial burden. Immunity attachments must be shown by a preponderance of the evidence.
Does Velasquez control dismissal when material facts are in dispute? Velasquez allows dismissal when facts disputed. State urges alignment with Velasquez's approach. Velasquez does not control; Peterson/Dennis governs.

Key Cases Cited

  • Velasquez v. State, 9 So.3d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (pretrial immunity determination when facts are disputed; denial of motion allowed)
  • Peterson v. State, 983 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (pretrial immunity procedure requiring weighing factual disputes)
  • Dennis v. State, 51 So.3d 456 (Fla.2010) (supreme court resolution adopting Peterson approach)
  • People v. Guenther, 740 P.2d 971 (Colo.1987) (immunity burden and pretrial dismissal framework)
  • McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973) (burden/independence of voluntariness considerations in similar contexts)
  • Dennis v. State, 17 So.3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (discussed in Velasquez; cited in the conflict resolution)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cruz v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 23, 2011
Citation: 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2232
Docket Number: No. 4D09-3595
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.