Crutchfield v. Lawson
294 Ga. 407
| Ga. | 2014Background
- Paulding County Superior Court entered a final divorce decree on April 17, 2008.
- Wife filed a contempt action in Cobb County Superior Court on September 9, 2011.
- Husband answered in Cobb and cross-applied for contempt, challenging Cobb's jurisdiction, on October 18, 2011.
- May 3, 2012 hearing: parties consented in open court to Cobb County jurisdiction.
- Cobb County court conducted hearings and ultimately found Husband in contempt.
- Husband moved to set aside the contempt judgment, arguing lack of subject matter jurisdiction; trial court denied; he appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the case lies in subject matter jurisdiction or venue | Crutchfield argues Cobb lacked subject matter jurisdiction. | Lawson contends Cobb had proper venue under Buckholts and consent to Cobb's jurisdiction. | Venue, not subject matter jurisdiction; consent barred challenge to venue; judgment affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Goodrum v. Goodrum, 202 Ga. 135 (1947) (contempt power tied to the offended court)
- Jacob v. Koslow, 282 Ga. 51 (2007) (distinguishes subject matter jurisdiction from venue)
- Buckholts v. Buckholts, 251 Ga. 58 (1983) (divorce/alt-venue rule; counterclaim for contempt in non-original court)
- Parris v. Douthit, 287 Ga. 119 (2010) (venue waiver when not properly raised under statute)
- Robinson v. Attapulgus Clay Co., 55 Ga. App. 141 (1937) (subject matter/venue treatment in early determinative context)
- Hopkins v. Hopkins, 237 Ga. 845 (1976) (distinguishes jurisdiction and venue concepts)
- Abushmais v. Erby, 282 Ga. 619 (2007) (equitable considerations in contempt/venue)
- Doke v. Doke, 248 Ga. 514 (1981) (contempt mechanics in divorce context)
- Herring v. Herring, 246 Ga. 462 (1980) (procedural aspects of contempt and venue)
