Cross v. Olsen
303 P.3d 1030
Utah Ct. App.2013Background
- Lake Forest Properties LLC and Colco Development, Inc. sue for indemnification under a Settlement Agreement after prior litigation involving a water purchase dispute.
- Cross settled with Defendants in the Lake Forest Action; the Settlement Agreement included an Indemnity Provision, a Release Provision, a Notification Provision, and a Confidentiality Provision with narrow exceptions.
- Cross disclosed terms through statements in the Lake Forest Action and later filed the present case not under seal.
- Cross assigned his interest in the present litigation to Lake Forest after judgment was entered in the Lake Forest Action.
- The trial court granted Defendants summary judgment, holding that Cross’s breaches of the Confidentiality Provision excused Defendants’ performance under the Indemnity Provision.
- The court did not resolve all issues regarding the timing of breaches or potential separate breaches of the Notification Provision.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Cross’s disclosures breached the Confidentiality Provision. | Lake Forest argues Cross’s disclosures were either non-identifying or within permissible scope. | Defendants contend Cross disclosed the existence of the indemnity and confidentiality terms and the provision itself. | Cross breached by disclosing confidentiality terms; but indemnity existence was excluded from Confidentiality Provision. |
| Whether the first breach rule excused Defendants’ performance. | Lake Forest asserts any breach was not a material, first breach that excuses performance. | Defendants rely on first breach rule to excuse future performance after Cross’s breaches. | The trial court erred in concluding material breach; remand for factual materiality analysis. |
Key Cases Cited
- Saunders v. Sharp, 840 P.2d 796 (Utah Ct. App. 1992) (material breach requires substantial and important impact on contract)
- State v. Robison, 147 P.3d 448 (Utah 2006) (appellate review of contract terms and breach standards)
- Jackson v. Rich, 499 P.2d 279 (Utah 1972) (mutual dependence prerequisite for excuse of performance)
