Cristan Drayce Williams v. State
10-14-00307-CR
| Tex. App. | Jul 30, 2015Background
- Appellant Cristan Drayce Williams was stopped in a nearly empty parking garage at about 3:00 a.m., one hour after nearby bars had closed; his vehicle engine was running.
- Sgt. Jason Summers, on bicycle patrol, observed Williams’ parked car and checked the upper level before returning and seeing Williams drive at least three laps around the second level.
- Summers suspected intoxication (difficulty locating the exit/ramp) and detained Williams; Williams was arrested for DWI and possession of marijuana.
- Williams moved to suppress, arguing the detention lacked reasonable suspicion; the trial court denied the motion.
- Williams pled guilty to possession of marijuana (under two ounces), with deferred adjudication and 18 months community supervision; he appealed the denial of the suppression motion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the officer had reasonable suspicion to detain Williams for an investigatory stop | Williams: driving laps was not unlawful or sufficiently distinguishable from innocent behavior, so no reasonable suspicion | State: repeated laps in a nearly empty garage at 3 a.m. soon after bars closed was unusual and consistent with possible intoxicated driving | Court: Officer had reasonable suspicion under the totality of circumstances; suppression denied |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Robinson, 334 S.W.3d 776 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (standard for reviewing suppression rulings)
- State v. Kelly, 204 S.W.3d 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (evidentiary review principles for suppression hearings)
- Wiede v. State, 214 S.W.3d 17 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (trial judge as factfinder and credibility determinations)
- Amador v. State, 221 S.W.3d 666 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (deference to trial court on historical facts and credibility-based applications)
- Hereford v. State, 339 S.W.3d 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (de novo review for application-of-law-to-fact questions not based on credibility)
- Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (totality-of-circumstances test for investigatory stops)
- Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1983) (limits on detention length for investigatory stops)
- Castro v. State, 227 S.W.3d 737 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (definition of reasonable suspicion)
- Derichsweiler v. State, 348 S.W.3d 906 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (elements of unusual activity linking person to crime)
- Wade v. State, 422 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (suspect’s behavior must be distinguishable from innocent conduct)
- Crockett v. State, 803 S.W.2d 308 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (behavior must set suspect apart from innocent people)
