Craft v. State
309 Ga. App. 698
Ga. Ct. App.2011Background
- Craft was convicted in Georgia of aggravated assault, disorderly conduct, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, criminal damage to property in the first degree, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, arising from a shooting at an apartment complex.
- He challenged Batson-based jury strikes, claimed insufficient evidence for aggravated assault against the resident, and asserted a defective indictment and trial errors including improper court questioning and jury instructions, plus ineffective assistance of counsel.
- The appellate court reversed Craft’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony due to a misinstruction that allowed conviction in a manner not alleged in the indictment, but allowed retrial on that offense because the evidence supported it.
- The court affirmed Craft’s other convictions, finding no reversible error on Batson, sufficiency for aggravated assault, trial conduct, or related jury instructions apart from the noted error.
- The trial was bifurcated; after general verdicts, evidence and argument on possession of a firearm by a convicted felon occurred, and a juror’s question led to a remedial instruction.
- The court held that the possession-of-a-firearm-by-a-convicted-felon conviction could be retried if the charge is proven, but the specific manner-of-commission defect required reversal on that count.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Batson challenge denial | Craft contends the state discriminated in strikes against minority jurors. | State offered race-neutral explanations for each strike and court credited them. | Batson challenge denied; no clear error. |
| Sufficiency of evidence for aggravated assault | Evidence shows intent to place victim in fear of imminent violent injury. | Defense attacked the sufficiency of the evidence to prove aggravated assault. | Evidence sufficient to support aggravated assault conviction. |
| Indictment defect re: possession of firearm during the felony | Indictment properly predicates on criminal damage to property first degree. | Indictment error because predicate felony was broader than charged. | Conviction reversed due to charge error; retrial permitted. |
| Judge’s conduct under OCGA § 17-8-57 | Judge’s questioning and aiding the State violated constitutional limits on judicial commentary. | Judicial questions were permissible for purposes of truth-seeking and not improper commentary. | No OCGA § 17-8-57 violation; actions not contrary to statute. |
| Charge on possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony | Court instructed on possession beyond what indictment alleged. | Limiting instruction was not given; due process violated. | Due process violation; reversal on this count. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | Counsel failed to request a reckless conduct or trespass lesser-included-offense instruction where warranted. | No merit to ineffective-assistance claims given the evidentiary posture and controlling law. | Ineffective-assistance claims addressed; parts resolved as moot or lacked merit. |
Key Cases Cited
- Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (U.S. 1986) (three-step Batson framework for racial discrimination in jury selection)
- Lively v. State, 262 Ga. 510 (1992) (standard for reviewing Batson determinations)
- George v. State, 263 Ga.App. 541 (2003) (explanation limiting reliance on isolated grounds for Batson error)
- Milner v. State, 297 Ga.App. 859 (2009) (due process concerns when jury charge covers uncharged manners of the offense)
- Dukes v. State, 265 Ga. 422 (1995) (reasonable possibility standard for charges differing from indictment)
- Levin v. State, 222 Ga.App. 123 (1996) (plain-error review of jury charges that affect substantial rights)
- Shaw v. State, 238 Ga.App. 757 (1999) (reckless conduct charge not warranted where evidence shows intent for aggravated assault)
- Edwards v. State, 264 Ga. 131 (1994) (requirement to request lesser-included-offense instruction when evidence supports it)
