midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
858 F. Supp. 2d 903
N.D. Ohio
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Michael Corwin seeks declaratory judgment and accounting regarding 31 songs created during his Rediscover membership.
  • Defendant Wesley Quinonez is founder of Rediscover and contends he is the sole author and owner of the songs.
  • Defendant moves for summary judgment on the declared authorship issue; plaintiffs complaint would be dismissed if defendant prevails.
  • Four Rediscover albums (Out of Touch, Call Me When You Get This, Sleepless Nights, Lost Songs) contain the 31 disputed songs, with recording history described for each album.
  • BMI registrations registered four songs in equal shares among the four members, suggesting some royalty sharing but not resolving authorship.
  • Defendant later secured four copyright registrations naming Quinonez as sole author and claimant after this suit was filed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Joint authorship under Childress test Corwin alleges mutual intent to be joint authors and independently copyrightable contributions. Quinonez contends there was no mutual intent to joint authorship. Corwin fails first prong; no joint authorship.
Effect of copyright registration on joint authorship claim under 411(a) Plaintiff argues 411(a) bars suit due to lack of registration. Defendant asserts no infringement action and registration issues are inapposite for declaratory relief. 411(a) not applicable to declaratory judgment on joint authorship; suit survives this issue.
Sole authorship and ownership by Quinonez Plaintiff claims joint or co-authorship of compositions and sound recordings. Defendant presents sole authorship evidenced by post hoc registrations and control in production. Court grants summary judgment; Quinonez is sole author and owner.
BMI registrations as evidence of joint authorship BMI registrations showing four-way equal shares support joint authorship. Registrations by all members do not prove joint authorship between Corwin and Quinonez; evidence is insufficient. BMI registrations do not establish joint authorship between Corwin and Quinonez; insufficient.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gaiman v. McFarlane, 360 F.3d 644 (7th Cir. 2004) (suit for declaration of joint authorship is not infringement action)
  • Childress v. Taylor, 945 F.2d 500 (2d Cir. 1991) (test for joint authorship: intent and independently copyrightable contribution)
  • Thomson v. Larson, 147 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 1998) (intent not strictly subjective; factors beyond words matter)
  • Erickson v. Trinity Theatre, Inc., 13 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 1994) (independently copyrightable contribution required; intent standard applied)
  • Janky v. Lake County Convention & Visitors Bureau, 576 F.3d 356 (7th Cir. 2009) (illustrates joint authorship concepts in practice)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Corwin v. Quinonez
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Mar 12, 2012
Citations: 858 F. Supp. 2d 903; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32299; 102 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1178; 2012 WL 832600; Case No. 3:10 CV 2163
Docket Number: Case No. 3:10 CV 2163
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio
Log In
    Corwin v. Quinonez, 858 F. Supp. 2d 903