History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cortez v. Doty Bros. Equip. Co.
15 Cal. App. 5th 1
| Cal. Ct. App. 5th | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Cortez, a Teamsters-represented truck driver, sued Doty Bros. individually and on behalf of a putative class for various Labor Code and Wage Order 16 violations and brought a representative PAGA claim.
  • Doty Bros. petitioned to compel arbitration under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (CBA); the trial court granted arbitration for individual claims but severed and stayed the PAGA claim and reserved class-arbitrability to the arbitrator.
  • The parties agreed the trial court (not the arbitrator) would decide whether the CBA authorized classwide arbitration; the court held the CBA did not authorize class arbitration and dismissed the class claims (March 23, 2015).
  • Cortez appealed; jurisdictional issues arose because the PAGA claim was pending, and appellate courts had held the death knell doctrine does not apply when a PAGA claim survives.
  • Cortez later voluntarily dismissed his PAGA claim and sought review again; the appellate court exercised its discretion to treat the consolidated appeal as a petition for writ of mandate and reached the merits.
  • Holding on the merits: the CBA clearly and unmistakably required arbitration of Wage Order 16–based claims (overtime, meal/rest breaks, recordkeeping), but did not cover (1) post-termination wage-payment penalties (Lab. Code § 203) or (2) the UCL claim premised on that wage-payment violation; the CBA did not authorize classwide arbitration.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether death knell doctrine made the March 23, 2015 order dismissing class claims immediately appealable while PAGA claim remained pending Cortez: order was appealable under death knell; later dismissal of PAGA cured any defect Doty Bros.: PAGA survival defeats death knell appealability Death knell does not apply when a PAGA claim remains pending; court declined to rely on appeal route and treated matter as writ petition
Whether the court could be treated as deciding class-arbitrability (procedural posture) Cortez: appeal permitted review of related arbitration order as intermediate order affecting substantial rights Doty Bros.: trial-court determination of class arbitrability appropriate Appellate court exercised discretion to treat consolidated appeal as writ and review both orders for efficiency
Whether the CBA’s arbitration clause clearly and unmistakably covered Labor Code/Wage Order claims Cortez: CBA doesn’t mention Labor Code, so statutory claims aren’t waived/arbitrable Doty Bros.: CBA expressly requires arbitration of disputes "arising from" Wage Order 16, thus covers related Labor Code claims Claims enforcing Wage Order 16 (overtime, meal/rest breaks, recordkeeping) are arbitrable; but §203 post-termination wage-payment penalty and related UCL claim are not covered
Whether the CBA authorizes classwide arbitration, or NLRA makes class-waiver invalid Cortez: NLRA’s protection of concerted activity makes class-waivers invalid; class arbitration should be allowed Doty Bros.: CBA language limits arbitration to individual grievances; no contractual authorization for class arbitration CBA does not authorize class arbitration; NLRA argument rejected under California precedent (Iskanian)

Key Cases Cited

  • Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 (Cal. 2014) (PAGA actions nonwaivable; NLRA does not bar excluding class claims from CBA arbitration)
  • In re Baycol Cases I & II, 51 Cal.4th 751 (Cal. 2011) (death knell doctrine permits immediate appeal of orders that effectively terminate class claims)
  • Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, 556 U.S. 247 (U.S. 2009) (CBA can clear and unmistakably waive employees’ judicial forum rights for statutory claims)
  • Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (U.S. 2010) (class arbitration unavailable absent contractual authorization)
  • Munoz v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 238 Cal.App.4th 291 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) (death knell inapplicable while PAGA claim pending)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cortez v. Doty Bros. Equip. Co.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Date Published: Aug 15, 2017
Citation: 15 Cal. App. 5th 1
Docket Number: B275255
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App. 5th