Correy James Dartez v. State of Mississippi
177 So. 3d 420
| Miss. | 2015Background
- Correy Dartez smothered his wife Victoria in their Biloxi apartment on Jan. 30, 2013; he then called 911 and confessed to police at the scene and during a later custodial interview.
- Dartez and Victoria were both diagnosed with bipolar disorder; Victoria also had Down’s syndrome; Dartez admitted being off psychiatric medication for about a day before the killing.
- Police read Dartez his Miranda rights; he repeatedly waived counsel and made detailed, remorseful statements to Officer Tim McKaig describing the killing and his motives.
- Dartez was charged with murder, a competency evaluation was ordered (Dr. Beverly Smallwood), and the court found him competent to stand trial; the full evaluation was sealed.
- No insanity defense was presented at trial; Dartez put on no defense and was convicted by a jury and sentenced to life imprisonment.
- On appeal Dartez argued trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to (1) raise an insanity defense and (2) challenge the voluntariness/admissibility of his confession.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an insanity defense | Dartez: counsel should have asserted insanity given mental-health history and medication lapse | State: record does not show deficient performance or prejudice; trial court found competence and report was sealed | Court: Declined to decide ineffectiveness on direct appeal—record insufficient; affirmed conviction and directed relief, if any, via PCR after leave of court |
| Whether counsel was ineffective for not suppressing Dartez’s confession as involuntary | Dartez: statements were not knowingly/voluntarily given and should have been challenged | State: Miranda warnings were given; Dartez repeatedly waived counsel and answered questions knowingly | Court: Did not resolve voluntariness on direct appeal due to incomplete record regarding counsel’s decisions; declined to address ineffectiveness claim here |
Key Cases Cited
- Archer v. State, 986 So. 2d 951 (Miss. 2008) (ineffective-assistance claims generally resolved in post-conviction proceedings)
- Read v. State, 430 So. 2d 832 (Miss. 1983) (preservation and appropriate procedure when the record is insufficient on direct appeal)
- Holly v. State, 716 So. 2d 979 (Miss. 1998) (applying Strickland two-prong test in Mississippi)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966) (custodial interrogation warnings requirement)
