History
  • No items yet
midpage
969 F. Supp. 2d 89
D. Mass.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Correia and Runnals, resident property managers at EZ Storage in Framingham, report a 2010 incident with Framingham officers Brown and Pini entering the facility.
  • Correia allegedly confronted Brown as he exited the facility; dispute over whether Brown flashed blue lights, brandished a gun, and warned Correia to move or be shot.
  • Blue interviewed the plaintiffs and viewed surveillance footage but did not file a report or escalate the matter internally.
  • Avila later visited the facility; plaintiffs claim intimidation, while Avila contends he stopped there by mistake.
  • May 2010 interactions included police involvement and promises by Framingham’s Chief to limit unsupervised visits; Stratton later entered the facility in an unmarked Boston PD vehicle.
  • The operative complaint originally included twelve counts; the Court denied amending to add new defendants and later motions for summary judgment were filed by the parties.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Substantive due process shock-the-conscience standard Correia/Runnals: Brown’s conduct was egregious and shocked conscience Brown/Blue/Avila: conduct not highly egregious; not shock-the-conscience level Count I granted for defendants (no shock-to-conscience finding)
Conspiracy to cover up civil rights violation (Counts IX, X) Plaintiffs claim agreement to cover up and intimidate No evidence of actionable agreement to deprive rights Counts IX, X dismissed
Civil rights claims under MA C.R.A. (Counts II, X, XII) State-law claims coextensive with §1983 allegations Coextensive with federal grounds; no independent state claim Counts II, X, XII dismissed
Municipal liability for negligent supervision (Count IV) Town failed to supervise/ train officers to prevent IIED Town not liable for supervisors’ acts by other agencies; no identified tort Count IV denied (negligent supervision claim survives)

Key Cases Cited

  • Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) (qualified immunity for police)
  • Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-Montanez, 212 F.3d 617 (1st Cir. 2000) (non-physical harassment standards for due process)
  • Landrigan v. City of Warwick, 628 F.2d 736 (1st Cir. 1980) (failure to file report not alone actionable under §1983)
  • Cummings v. McIntire, 271 F.3d 341 (1st Cir. 2001) (extreme/arbitrary conduct required for substantive due process)
  • Kennedy v. Town of Billerica, 617 F.3d 520 (1st Cir. 2010) (supervisory negligence limits against municipalities)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Correia v. Town of Framingham
Court Name: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Sep 3, 2013
Citations: 969 F. Supp. 2d 89; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126026; 2013 WL 4737033; Civil Action No. 12-10828-NMG
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 12-10828-NMG
Court Abbreviation: D. Mass.
Log In
    Correia v. Town of Framingham, 969 F. Supp. 2d 89