Cooper v. Estate of Gatwood
119 So. 3d 1031
| Miss. | 2013Background
- 1996 Lamar County divorce decree required Gatwood to pay child support, life insurance, medical insurance, and medical expenses for his minor children.
- In 2009, the chancery court awarded Cooper $68,671.27 for overdue insurance and medical costs, to be paid in $200 monthly installments with no interest.
- On December 1, 2010, Parsons filed a garnishment suggestion in circuit court against Lamar Auto Salvage, claiming Gatwood owed the $68,671.27 plus 8% interest, but failed to disclose the installment order and Gatwood’s current payment status.
- The circuit court defaulted Lamar Auto Salvage, then granted a settlement agreement directing Lamar to pay Cooper, after which Gatwood’s garnishment actions continued and sanctions were sought.
- Gatwood died on June 29, 2012; this appeal concerns sanctions and related rulings, with issues about mootness and party joinder.
- The Lamar County Circuit Court sanctioned Parsons and Cooper for misrepresentations, voided the garnishment against Lamar Auto, and the estate challenges those rulings on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanctions proper under Rule 11 and Litigation Accountability Act | Cooper/Parsons acted in good faith; sanctions unjust | Court should uphold sanctions for misrepresentation | Sanctions upheld; misrepresentations justified sanctions |
| Gatwood’s joinder: timeliness and standing | Gatwood timely joined; had standing | Gatwood was untimely and lacked standing | Timely joinder allowed; Gatwood had standing under Rule 19 |
| Whether insurance/medical expenses vest as regular child support | Expenses vest only as per chancellor’s installment order | Expenses constitute regular child support vesting immediately | Not plain error; installment order valid; misrepresentation remediable by appeal |
| Mootness due to Gatwood’s death | Issues moot; relief cannot be granted | Death does not moot issues already in appeal; some remedies remain | Not properly before court; mootness not dispositive |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Spencer, 985 So.2d 330 (Miss. 2008) (defines frivolous under Rule 11 and LAA)
- In re Estate of Ladner, 909 So.2d 1051 (Miss. 2004) (sanctions upheld for misrepresentation by counsel)
- First Mississippi National Bank v. KLH Industries, Inc., 457 So.2d 1333 (Miss. 1984) (garnishment proceedings are civil actions governed by MRCP)
