History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cooksey v. Landry
761 S.E.2d 61
Ga.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Christopher Landry died by suicide in 2012 after treatment by psychiatrist Crit Cooksey who prescribed Seroquel and Cymbalta with FDA black box warnings.
  • Landry family sought Christopher’s psychiatric records for medical malpractice/ wrongful death and survival claims; Cooksey refused citing psychiatrist-patient privilege under OCGA § 24-5-501 (a).
  • Plaintiffs obtained a trial-court equitable injunction demanding production of all records; appellate stay was granted pending review.
  • Georgia law provides a nearly absolute psychiatrist-patient privilege, which survives the patient’s death and generally requires waiver by the patient, not by his estate.
  • The trial court’s injunction included privileged communications; the court remanded to distinguish non-privileged records and to assess possible waiver.
  • The Supreme Court held the trial court erred in ordering disclosure of privileged material but affirmed as to non-privileged records; case remanded for further protection-compliant review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether psychiatric records are privileged under OCGA § 24-5-501 (a). Landrys seek records via equity to investigate claims. Cooksey argues records are privileged and protected from disclosure. Privileged; cannot be disclosed absent patient waiver.
Whether equity can compel production despite the psychiatrist-patient privilege. Equity should allow discovery to pursue legitimate claims. Equity cannot override statutory privilege. Equity cannot override the statute; trial court erred.
Whether the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the patient’s death and can be waived by a deceased patient’s estate representative. Estate representative should be able to waive to pursue claims. Privilege survives death and waiver lies with patient only. Privilege survives death; waiver by estate representative not authorized.
What is the scope of non-privileged vs privileged records and waivable information on remand. All relevant non-privileged information should be disclosed. Only non-privileged records may be disclosed; privilege persists for protected materials. Remand to determine non-privileged records and any waivers; disclose non-privileged material.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. Liberty Oil & Refining Corp., 261 Ga. 214 (1991) (equity cannot override statutory rights; as a matter of public policy, statutory rights trump equity)
  • Kennestone Hosp., Inc. v. Hopson, 273 Ga. 145 (2000) (confidential psychiatrist-patient communications privilege to encourage treatment)
  • Herendeen v. State, 279 Ga. 323 (2005) (psychiatrist-patient privilege survives death; communications protected)
  • Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877 (1984) (psychiatrist-patient communications privilege; limits and scope clarified)
  • Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996) (federal psychotherapist-patient privilege; certainty in protection essential)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cooksey v. Landry
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 30, 2014
Citation: 761 S.E.2d 61
Docket Number: S14A0926
Court Abbreviation: Ga.