Cooksey v. Landry
761 S.E.2d 61
Ga.2014Background
- Christopher Landry died by suicide in 2012 after treatment by psychiatrist Crit Cooksey who prescribed Seroquel and Cymbalta with FDA black box warnings.
- Landry family sought Christopher’s psychiatric records for medical malpractice/ wrongful death and survival claims; Cooksey refused citing psychiatrist-patient privilege under OCGA § 24-5-501 (a).
- Plaintiffs obtained a trial-court equitable injunction demanding production of all records; appellate stay was granted pending review.
- Georgia law provides a nearly absolute psychiatrist-patient privilege, which survives the patient’s death and generally requires waiver by the patient, not by his estate.
- The trial court’s injunction included privileged communications; the court remanded to distinguish non-privileged records and to assess possible waiver.
- The Supreme Court held the trial court erred in ordering disclosure of privileged material but affirmed as to non-privileged records; case remanded for further protection-compliant review.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether psychiatric records are privileged under OCGA § 24-5-501 (a). | Landrys seek records via equity to investigate claims. | Cooksey argues records are privileged and protected from disclosure. | Privileged; cannot be disclosed absent patient waiver. |
| Whether equity can compel production despite the psychiatrist-patient privilege. | Equity should allow discovery to pursue legitimate claims. | Equity cannot override statutory privilege. | Equity cannot override the statute; trial court erred. |
| Whether the psychiatrist-patient privilege survives the patient’s death and can be waived by a deceased patient’s estate representative. | Estate representative should be able to waive to pursue claims. | Privilege survives death and waiver lies with patient only. | Privilege survives death; waiver by estate representative not authorized. |
| What is the scope of non-privileged vs privileged records and waivable information on remand. | All relevant non-privileged information should be disclosed. | Only non-privileged records may be disclosed; privilege persists for protected materials. | Remand to determine non-privileged records and any waivers; disclose non-privileged material. |
Key Cases Cited
- Brown v. Liberty Oil & Refining Corp., 261 Ga. 214 (1991) (equity cannot override statutory rights; as a matter of public policy, statutory rights trump equity)
- Kennestone Hosp., Inc. v. Hopson, 273 Ga. 145 (2000) (confidential psychiatrist-patient communications privilege to encourage treatment)
- Herendeen v. State, 279 Ga. 323 (2005) (psychiatrist-patient privilege survives death; communications protected)
- Sims v. State, 251 Ga. 877 (1984) (psychiatrist-patient communications privilege; limits and scope clarified)
- Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996) (federal psychotherapist-patient privilege; certainty in protection essential)
