History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cooke, Derrick Keith
WR-81,360-01
| Tex. | May 26, 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Plea: October 31, 2002, applicant pled guilty to third-degree felony assault causing bodily injury to a family member with one prior conviction, under a plea agreement and deferred adjudication for five years.
  • Adjudication: January 3, 2008, court adjudicated guilt, sentenced to three years in prison.
  • Enhancement: Hood County case (2007 offense) used applicant’s prior Tarrant County conviction for enhancement.
  • Hood County conviction: May 23, 2008, jury convicted; eight-year sentence imposed.
  • Current status: applicant discharged Tarrant County sentence March 11, 2013; Hood County sentence to be served until 2018; collateral consequences noted.
  • Court’s order: 2015 Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ordered briefing on collateral consequences and merits

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Collateral consequences as jurisdictional question Cooke claims collateral consequences invoke jurisdiction. State asserts collateral consequences are not jurisdictional or hinge on merits. Collateral consequences are jurisdictional; court has jurisdiction to proceed on merits.
Whether Cooke’s Tarrant conviction status warrants vacating the sentence Sentence was illegal due to improper enhancement by New Mexico conviction. Enhancement valid under then-existing law; not illegal. Sentence was illegal; conviction should be vacated and remand for new trial.
Ineffective assistance for failing to object to New Mexico enhancement Counsel failed to object to use of out-of-state conviction for enhancement. Law unsettled; no clearly defined proposition; no deficient performance. No ineffective assistance; claim denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ex parte Graves, 70 S.W.3d 103 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (jurisdictional threshold for habeas collateral consequences)
  • Ex parte Chandler, 182 S.W.3d 350 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (unsettled law; burden on showing deficient performance hinges on clarity)
  • Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (plea withdrawal when illegal sentence results from negotiated plea)
  • Ex parte Parrott, 396 S.W.3d 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (ineffective assistance standard in non-capital cases; Strickland framework)
  • Chiarini v. State, 442 S.W.3d 318 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (statutory interpretation; plain meaning governs absent ambiguity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cooke, Derrick Keith
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: May 26, 2015
Docket Number: WR-81,360-01
Court Abbreviation: Tex.