History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cook v. Brewer
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5212
| 9th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Cook, an Arizona prisoner, faces execution on April 5, 2011, and sues state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Eighth Amendment relief.
  • District court dismissed Cook’s claims under Rule 12(b)(6); he appeals challenging two Eighth Amendment theories related to the execution drug sodium thiopental.
  • Arizona’s lethal-injection protocol uses sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide, then potassium chloride, with safeguards to confirm unconsciousness.
  • Cook alleges the drug is foreign-made, non-FDA approved, potentially contaminated or ineffective, and could cause unconstitutional pain if not properly anesthetized.
  • The court, applying the Baze “sure or very likely to cause serious illness” standard, affirms dismissal as Cook’s allegations are speculative and fail to show a substantial risk of harm.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Cook plausibly alleges a substantial risk of serious harm from the foreign drug. Cook argues the foreign, non-FDA drug may be contaminated or ineffective. Defendants contend allegations are speculative and lack specific facts. Dismissed; allegations insufficient under Baze/Iqbal.
Whether administering the foreign drug would render medical staff deliberately indifferent. Administration would show indifference if drug is dangerous. No plausible claim without a plausible harm allegation. Dismissed; no plausible Eighth Amendment claim.

Key Cases Cited

  • Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (U.S. 2008) (requires a substantial risk of serious harm for Eighth Amendment challenges to execution protocols)
  • Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1994) (establishes objective-subjective components of Eighth Amendment standard)
  • Iqbal v. Ashcroft, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (U.S. 2009) (pleading standards require plausible claims, not mere conclusory assertions)
  • Twombly v. Bell Atl. Corp., 550 U.S. 544 (U.S. 2007) (pleading must include more than a mere recitation of elements)
  • Landrigan v. Brewer, 131 S. Ct. 445 (S. Ct. 2010) (foreign-drug importation alone not enough to state a constitutional claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cook v. Brewer
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 16, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5212
Docket Number: 11-15303
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.