Community Health Partners Physicians, Inc. v. Sharbek
2011 Ohio 4033
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Sharbek and Community Health entered a contract (Aug 2006) for medical-billing services; CHP billed Sharbek monthly and took a percentage of amounts reported by Sharbek as received.
- Between March 2007 and November 2007, Sharbek received $240,746.50 from patient accounts and reported payments to CHH; CHH invoiced Sharbek accordingly.
- Sharbek paid some invoices but withheld payment for March–November 2007 services; final payment in May 2007 covered pre-March 2007 services only.
- In Aug 2007 Sharbek notified CHH of termination; termination would take effect after a 90-day notice per the contract.
- CHH sued on July 1, 2009 for breach of contract seeking payment for March–November 2007 services; the trial court granted summary judgment for CHH in the amount of $16,906.32 plus interest and costs (Jul 14, 2010).
- Sharbek appeals, arguing genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether summary judgment was proper on the contract claim | CHH proved contract, performance, breach, and damages | Genuine issues of material fact exist about CHH’s performance | Yes; summary judgment affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc., 50 Ohio St.2d 317 (Ohio 1977) (summary judgment standards; reasonable minds view evidence)
- Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (Ohio 1996) (Dresher burden-shifting on summary judgment)
- Henkle v. Henkle, 75 Ohio App.3d 732 (Ohio App.3d 1991) (affidavit must show genuine issue of material fact)
- H & F Transp., Inc. v. Satin Ride Equine Transport, Inc., 9th Dist. No. 06CA0069-M, 2008-Ohio-1004 (9th Dist. 2008) (breach-of-contract elements and burden of proof)
- Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Sturgil, 9th Dist. No. 21787, 2004-Ohio-4453 (9th Dist. 2004) (Dresher burden-shifting on contract claim)
- Cent. Mtge. Co. v. Elia, 9th Dist. No. 25505, 2011-Ohio-3188 (9th Dist. 2011) (affidavit evidence must show genuine issue)
