165 A.3d 994
Pa. Super. Ct.2017Background
- Commonwealth appeals from suppression order granting pre-trial suppression motion by Williams.
- Williams faced multiple PWID counts, a paraphernalia count, and related charges.
- suppression hearing Oct. 6, 2016 featured Erie Police testimony about a March 18, 2016 shooting at 1016 West 4th Street.
- Police linked Williams to the Knights Inn; key card and room discrepancies suggested possible information about a room where a victim or suspect might be.
- Officers entered Knights Inn room 231 without a warrant; contraband was observed and later seized under a warrant, prompting suppression.
- Trial court ruled Williams had a legitimate privacy interest in room 231, suppressing the evidence; Commonwealth appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Williams had a legitimate expectation of privacy in room 231. | Commonwealth: no valid privacy interest; room 231 not shown to be Williams's occupancy. | Williams: maintained privacy in the room as a hotel guest/occupant under applicable standards. | Commonwealth prevailed; Williams failed to prove a legitimate expectation of privacy in room 231. |
Key Cases Cited
- Commonwealth v. Brundidge, 620 A.2d 1115 (Pa. 1993) (hotel room Fourth Amendment protections to occupants)
- Commonwealth v. Dean, 940 A.2d 514 (Pa. Super. 2008) (hotel guest privacy expectations during valid rental period)
- Commonwealth v. Enimpah, 106 A.3d 695 (Pa. 2014) (no privacy interest means no need to address warrant exceptions)
- Commonwealth v. Millner, 585 Pa. 237 (2005) (subjective and objective privacy expectations; protecting secrecy alone is not enough)
- Commonwealth v. Viall, 890 A.2d 419 (Pa. Super. 2005) (totality of circumstances in determining reasonableness of privacy expectation)
- Commonwealth v. Korn, 139 A.3d 249 (Pa. Super. 2016) (privacy expectation must be legitimate and reasonable)
- Commonwealth v. Brown, 996 A.2d 473 (Pa. 2010) (standard for reviewing suppression orders; de novo on law)