History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Widgins
29 A.3d 816
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Widgins was convicted April 4, 2007, after a non-jury trial, of possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver.
  • He was sentenced September 19, 2007 to 5 to 10 years of incarceration.
  • Widgins filed a timely PCRA petition on November 19, 2007; amended petition filed May 12, 2009.
  • A video evidentiary hearing occurred August 12, 2009, after which the court dismissed the petition to reinstate appellate rights nunc pro tunc.
  • Widgins appealed to the Superior Court on September 11, 2009; counsel later filed an Application to Withdraw and an Anders brief.
  • The court conducted independent review under Turner/Finley standards (as clarified by Pitts) and denied relief, granting counsel’s withdrawal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether counsel's withdrawal complied with Turner/Finley and Pitts. Widgins contends counsel failed to properly notify or review issues. Commonwealth asserts substantial compliance with Turner/Finley as refined by Pitts. Counsel properly withdrawn after substantial compliance.
Whether Widgins is entitled to PCRA relief for ineffective assistance claiming no direct appeal was filed. Widgins claims trial counsel failed to file a direct appeal as requested. Commonwealth argues no credible evidence of a request to appeal; credibility favoring counsel. No merit; credibility determinations support denial.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Pitts, 981 A.2d 875 (Pa. 2009) (overruled Friend's additional notice requirement to contemporaneous withdrawal)
  • Commonwealth v. Friend, 896 A.2d 607 (Pa. Super. 2006) (required contemporaneous notice and copies when counsel seeks withdrawal)
  • Commonwealth v. Turner, 518 Pa. 491 (1988) (Turner/Finley framework for evaluating counsel's no-merit letters)
  • Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) (Turner/Finley criteria for no-merit review)
  • Commonwealth v. Daniels, 947 A.2d 795 (Pa. Super. 2008) (counsel withdrawal notice requirements clarified)
  • Commonwealth v. Karanicolas, 836 A.2d 940 (Pa. Super. 2003) (substantial compliance standard for withdrawal)
  • Commonwealth v. Johnson, 966 A.2d 523 (Pa. 2009) (credibility determinations binding when supported by record)
  • Pitts, 981 A.2d 875 (Pa. 2009) (refines withdrawal and review standards under Turner/Finley)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Widgins
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 29, 2011
Citation: 29 A.3d 816
Docket Number: 2718 EDA 2009
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.