History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Stewart
469 Mass. 257
| Mass. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute; prior convictions used to impose enhanced sentences.
  • During a May 22, 2008 stop in Boston’s theater district, police observed the defendant with three others near Hayward Place, a known drug area.
  • The group huddled briefly in a doorway; officers approached the defendant and opened a heavy cigarette-style box in the backpack.
  • A digital scale with cocaine residue and subsequent cocaine and cash were seized; defendant moved to suppress the evidence.
  • Judge denied suppression; Appeals Court panel affirmed; SJC granted further appellate review; conviction ultimately vacated.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant? Stewart Stewart Yes; stop supported by reasonable suspicion.
Was opening the cigarette box a lawful search incident to arrest? Stewart Stewart No; not justified by probable cause at arrest moment.
Was there probable cause to arrest when the box was opened? Stewart Stewart No; insufficient objective evidence of an exchange by the defendant.
Were the cocaine and cash products of an illegal search and properly excluded? Stewart Stewart Yes; suppression was proper; not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Should the conviction stand given the suppression ruling? Stewart Stewart No; conviction vacated; retrial or nolle prosed; sentencing issues not reached.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Kennedy, 426 Mass. 703 (Mass. 1998) (silent-mmovie probable cause framework; observed exchange strengthens probable cause)
  • Commonwealth v. Santaliz, 413 Mass. 238 (Mass. 1992) (probable cause via silent movie sequence; inferred exchange must be supported by movements)
  • Commonwealth v. Levy, 459 Mass. 1010 (Mass. 2011) (failure to observe actual exchange weakens probable cause)
  • Commonwealth v. Gomes, 453 Mass. 506 (Mass. 2009) (reasonableness of investigatory stop based on officer’s experience)
  • Caputo v. Commonwealth, 439 Mass. 153 (Mass. 2003) (consent can limit scope of searches; withdrawal of consent)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Stewart
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Aug 7, 2014
Citation: 469 Mass. 257
Docket Number: SJC 11475
Court Abbreviation: Mass.